mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

M2FGB: A Min-Max Gradient Boosting Framework for Subgroup Fairness

arXiv 2504.12458 ↗First posted 16 Apr 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, fairness in machine learning has emerged as a critical concern to ensure that developed and deployed predictive models do not have disadvantageous predictions for marginalized groups. It is essential to mitigate discrimination against individuals based on protected attributes such as gender and race. In this work, we consider applying subgroup justice concepts to gradient-boosting machines designed for supervised learning problems. Our approach expanded gradient-boosting methodologies to explore a broader range of objective functions, which combines conventional losses such as the ones from classification and regression and a min-max fairness term. We study relevant theoretical properties of the solution of the min-max optimization problem. The optimization process explored the primal-dual problems at each boosting round. This generic framework can be adapted to diverse fairness concepts. The proposed min-max primal-dual gradient boosting algorithm was theoretically shown to converge under mild conditions and empirically shown to be a powerful and flexible approach to address binary and subgroup fairness.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2025.

Builds on

25 of 49 references.

References · 25

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  3. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  4. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
  5. 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 535
  6. 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 449
  7. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
  8. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 384
  9. 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 364
  10. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  11. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  12. 2020Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspectivecited by 153
13 more
  1. 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
  2. 2018An Intersectional Definition of Fairnesscited by 127
  3. 2018Optimization with Non-Differentiable Constraints with Applications to Fairness, Recall, Churn, and Other Goalscited by 103
  4. 2019AdaFair: Cumulative Fairness Adaptive Boostingcited by 45
  5. 2021Characterizing Intersectional Group Fairness with Worst-Case Comparisonscited by 42
  6. 2022On Learning Fairness and Accuracy on Multiple Subgroupscited by 32
  7. 2022FairGBM: Gradient Boosting with Fairness Constraintscited by 25
  8. 2019Fair Adversarial Gradient Tree Boostingcited by 17
  9. 2022Minimax AUC Fairness: Efficient Algorithm with Provable Convergencecited by 16
  10. 2018Fairness-aware Classification: Criterion, Convexity, and Boundscited by 14
  11. 2021Individually Fair Gradient Boostingcited by 12
  12. 2020FairXGBoost: Fairness-aware Classification in XGBoostcited by 9
  13. 2021Fair Tree Classifier using Strong Demographic Paritycited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.