Poly-Vector Retrieval: Reference and Content Embeddings for Legal Documents
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Legal and financial RAG
Abstract (arXiv)
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as an effective paradigm for generating contextually accurate answers by integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) with retrieval mechanisms. However, in legal contexts, users frequently reference norms by their labels or nicknames (e.g., Article 5 of the Constitution or Consumer Defense Code (CDC)), rather than by their content, posing challenges for traditional RAG approaches that rely solely on semantic embeddings of text. Furthermore, legal texts themselves heavily rely on explicit cross-references (e.g., "pursuant to Article 34") that function as pointers. Both scenarios pose challenges for traditional RAG approaches that rely solely on semantic embeddings of text, often failing to retrieve the necessary referenced content. This paper introduces Poly-Vector Retrieval, a method assigning multiple distinct embeddings to each legal provision: one embedding captures the content (the full text), another captures the label (the identifier or proper name), and optionally additional embeddings capture alternative denominations. Inspired by Frege's distinction between Sense and Reference, this poly-vector retrieval approach treats labels, identifiers and reference markers as rigid designators and content embeddings as carriers of semantic substance. Experiments on the Brazilian Federal Constitution demonstrate that Poly-Vector Retrieval significantly improves retrieval accuracy for label-centric queries and potential to resolve internal and external cross-references, without compromising performance on purely semantic queries. The study discusses philosophical and practical implications of explicitly separating reference from content in vector embeddings and proposes future research directions for applying this approach to broader legal datasets and other domains characterized by explicit reference identifiers.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Legal and financial RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 3 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2025.
Builds on
3 of 12 references.
References · 3
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2024Unlocking Legal Knowledge with Multi-Layered Embedding-Based Retrievalcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025All for law and law for all: Adaptive RAG Pipeline for Legal Research
- 2024LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domain
- 2025ASVRI-Legal: Fine-Tuning LLMs with Retrieval Augmented Generation for Enhanced Legal Regulation
- 2025Incorporating Legal Structure in Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Case Study on Copyright Fair Use
- 2025Towards Reliable Retrieval in RAG Systems for Large Legal Datasets
- 2026Legal RAG Bench: an end-to-end benchmark for legal RAG
- 2025Are We on the Right Way for Assessing Document Retrieval-Augmented Generation?
- 2025A Systematic Literature Review of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Techniques, Metrics, and Challenges