Unlocking Legal Knowledge with Multi-Layered Embedding-Based Retrieval
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work addresses the challenge of capturing the complexities of legal knowledge by proposing a multi-layered embedding-based retrieval method for legal and legislative texts. Creating embeddings not only for individual articles but also for their components (paragraphs, clauses) and structural groupings (books, titles, chapters, etc), we seek to capture the subtleties of legal information through the use of dense vectors of embeddings, representing it at varying levels of granularity. Our method meets various information needs by allowing the Retrieval Augmented Generation system to provide accurate responses, whether for specific segments or entire sections, tailored to the user's query. We explore the concepts of aboutness, semantic chunking, and inherent hierarchy within legal texts, arguing that this method enhances the legal information retrieval. Despite the focus being on Brazil's legislative methods and the Brazilian Constitution, which follow a civil law tradition, our findings should in principle be applicable across different legal systems, including those adhering to common law traditions. Furthermore, the principles of the proposed method extend beyond the legal domain, offering valuable insights for organizing and retrieving information in any field characterized by information encoded in hierarchical text.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2024.
Builds on
1 of 8 references.
References · 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Improving RAG Retrieval via Propositional Content Extraction: a Speech Act Theory Approachcited by 2
- 2025Poly-Vector Retrieval: Reference and Content Embeddings for Legal Documentscited by 0
- 2025Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval?cited by 0
- 2026Beyond Probabilistic Similarity: Structural, Temporal, and Causal Limitations of Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domaincited by 0
- 2026Beyond Probabilistic Similarity: Structural, Temporal, and Causal Limitations of Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domain8 Jun 2026
- 2025Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval?16 Jun 2025
- 2025Poly-Vector Retrieval: Reference and Content Embeddings for Legal Documents9 Apr 2025
- 2025Improving RAG Retrieval via Propositional Content Extraction: a Speech Act Theory Approach7 Mar 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Chunking German Legal Code
- 2026Legal RAG Bench: an end-to-end benchmark for legal RAG
- 2025Towards Reliable Retrieval in RAG Systems for Large Legal Datasets
- 2024LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domain
- 2025An Ontology-Driven Graph RAG for Legal Norms: A Structural, Temporal, and Deterministic Approach
- 2026LexPath: A domain-oriented multi-path framework for legal article retrieval ↗
- 2024DELTA: Pre-train a Discriminative Encoder for Legal Case Retrieval via Structural Word Alignment
- 2025Domain-Partitioned Hybrid RAG for Legal Reasoning: Toward Modular and Explainable Legal AI for India