mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Incorporating Legal Structure in Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Case Study on Copyright Fair Use

arXiv 2505.02164 ↗First posted 4 May 2025cs.CLcited by 6

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Legal and financial RAG

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents a domain-specific implementation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) tailored to the Fair Use Doctrine in U.S. copyright law. Motivated by the increasing prevalence of DMCA takedowns and the lack of accessible legal support for content creators, we propose a structured approach that combines semantic search with legal knowledge graphs and court citation networks to improve retrieval quality and reasoning reliability. Our prototype models legal precedents at the statutory factor level (e.g., purpose, nature, amount, market effect) and incorporates citation-weighted graph representations to prioritize doctrinally authoritative sources. We use Chain-of-Thought reasoning and interleaved retrieval steps to better emulate legal reasoning. Preliminary testing suggests this method improves doctrinal relevance in the retrieval process, laying groundwork for future evaluation and deployment of LLM-based legal assistance tools.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Legal and financial RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 14 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2025.

Builds on

14 of 30 references.

References · 14

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  3. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  4. 2022Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questionscited by 923
  5. 2023Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmapcited by 668
  6. 2023LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 336
  7. 2025From RAG to Memory: Non-Parametric Continual Learning for Large Language Modelscited by 231
  8. 2024Hallucination-Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI Legal Research Toolscited by 176
  9. 2024Large Legal Fictions: Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Modelscited by 150
  10. 2023Large Language Models in Law: A Surveycited by 128
  11. 2023Dense X Retrieval: What Retrieval Granularity Should We Use?cited by 88
  12. 2024KG-RAG: Bridging the Gap Between Knowledge and Creativitycited by 56
2 more
  1. 2023Sub-Sentence Encoder: Contrastive Learning of Propositional Semantic Representationscited by 20
  2. 2024Enhancing Structured-Data Retrieval with GraphRAG: Soccer Data Case Studycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Towards Reliable Retrieval in RAG Systems for Large Legal Datasets
  2. 2026Verifiable Retrieval for Legal Reasoning through Structure-driven Knowledge Graph
  3. 2025Domain-Partitioned Hybrid RAG for Legal Reasoning: Toward Modular and Explainable Legal AI for India
  4. 2024LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domain
  5. 2025All for law and law for all: Adaptive RAG Pipeline for Legal Research
  6. 2026Beyond Probabilistic Similarity: Structural, Temporal, and Causal Limitations of Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domain
  7. 2025An Ontology-Driven Graph RAG for Legal Norms: A Structural, Temporal, and Deterministic Approach
  8. 2026Fine-grained Claim-level RAG Benchmark for Law