LLM-driven Constrained Copy Generation through Iterative Refinement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Crafting a marketing message (copy), or copywriting is a challenging generation task, as the copy must adhere to various constraints. Copy creation is inherently iterative for humans, starting with an initial draft followed by successive refinements. However, manual copy creation is time-consuming and expensive, resulting in only a few copies for each use case. This limitation restricts our ability to personalize content to customers. Contrary to the manual approach, LLMs can generate copies quickly, but the generated content does not consistently meet all the constraints on the first attempt (similar to humans). While recent studies have shown promise in improving constrained generation through iterative refinement, they have primarily addressed tasks with only a few simple constraints. Consequently, the effectiveness of iterative refinement for tasks such as copy generation, which involves many intricate constraints, remains unclear. To address this gap, we propose an LLM-based end-to-end framework for scalable copy generation using iterative refinement. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to address multiple challenging constraints simultaneously in copy generation. Examples of these constraints include length, topics, keywords, preferred lexical ordering, and tone of voice. We demonstrate the performance of our framework by creating copies for e-commerce banners for three different use cases of varying complexity. Our results show that iterative refinement increases the copy success rate by 16.25-35.91% across use cases. Furthermore, the copies generated using our approach outperformed manually created content in multiple pilot studies using a multi-armed bandit framework. The winning copy improved the click-through rate by 38.5-45.21%.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2025.
Builds on
19 of 33 references.
References · 19
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
- 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 1,017
- 2023Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingcited by 817
- 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 376
- 2024Who Validates the Validators? Aligning LLM-Assisted Evaluation of LLM Outputs with Human Preferencescited by 144
- 2023Controlled Text Generation with Natural Language Instructionscited by 87
- 2023Are You Sure? Challenging LLMs Leads to Performance Drops in The FlipFlop Experimentcited by 77
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models on Controlled Generation Taskscited by 73
- 2023The Next Chapter: A Study of Large Language Models in Storytellingcited by 58
- 2024A New Creative Generation Pipeline for Click-Through Rate with Stable Diffusion Modelcited by 27
7 more
- 2024Weaver: Foundation Models for Creative Writingcited by 27
- 2022CREATER: CTR-driven Advertising Text Generation with Controlled Pre-Training and Contrastive Fine-Tuningcited by 17
- 2024Chaining text-to-image and large language model: A novel approach for generating personalized e-commerce bannerscited by 11
- 2024Controllable Text Generation in the Instruction-Tuning Eracited by 7
- 2022Automatic Controllable Product Copywriting for E-Commercecited by 5
- 2023Improved Diversity Maximization Algorithms for Matching and Pseudoforestcited by 3
- 2024Generating Attractive and Authentic Copywriting from Customer Reviewscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.