mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Benchmarking Image Embeddings for E-Commerce: Evaluating Off-the Shelf Foundation Models, Fine-Tuning Strategies and Practical Trade-offs

arXiv 2504.07567 ↗First posted 10 Apr 2025cs.CV cs.AI cs.CEcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We benchmark foundation models image embeddings for classification and retrieval in e-Commerce, evaluating their suitability for real-world applications. Our study spans embeddings from pre-trained convolutional and transformer models trained via supervised, self-supervised, and text-image contrastive learning. We assess full fine-tuning and transfer learning (top-tuning) on six diverse e-Commerce datasets: fashion, consumer goods, cars, food, and retail. Results show full fine-tuning consistently performs well, while text-image and self-supervised embeddings can match its performance with less training. While supervised embeddings remain stable across architectures, SSL and contrastive embeddings vary significantly, often benefiting from top-tuning. Top-tuning emerges as an efficient alternative to full fine-tuning, reducing computational costs. We also explore cross-tuning, noting its impact depends on dataset characteristics. Our findings offer practical guidelines for embedding selection and fine-tuning strategies, balancing efficiency and performance.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2025.

Builds on

20 of 27 references.

References · 20

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  4. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  5. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  6. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  7. 2023ImageBind: One Embedding Space To Bind Them Allcited by 1,162
  8. 2023EVA-CLIP: Improved Training Techniques for CLIP at Scalecited by 786
  9. 2020Rethinking Few-Shot Image Classification: a Good Embedding Is All You Need?cited by 435
  10. 2021ResNet strikes back: An improved training procedure in timmcited by 365
  11. 2023Demystifying CLIP Datacited by 265
  12. 2023MobileCLIP: Fast Image-Text Models through Multi-Modal Reinforced Trainingcited by 96
8 more
  1. 2023Battle of the Backbones: A Large-Scale Comparison of Pretrained Models across Computer Vision Taskscited by 72
  2. 2023The effectiveness of MAE pre-pretraining for billion-scale pretrainingcited by 68
  3. 2023Towards Universal Image Embeddings: A Large-Scale Dataset and Challenge for Generic Image Representationscited by 28
  4. 2023Quick-Tune: Quickly Learning Which Pretrained Model to Finetune and Howcited by 17
  5. 2023Substance or Style: What Does Your Image Embedding Know?cited by 5
  6. 2024No Train, all Gain: Self-Supervised Gradients Improve Deep Frozen Representationscited by 5
  7. 2023Pretrained Embeddings for E-commerce Machine Learning: When it Fails and Why?cited by 1
  8. 2023Transformer-empowered Multi-modal Item Embedding for Enhanced Image Search in E-Commercecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.