mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Can you Finetune your Binoculars? Embedding Text Watermarks into the Weights of Large Language Models

arXiv 2504.06446 ↗First posted 8 Apr 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 4

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

The indistinguishability of AI-generated content from human text raises challenges in transparency and accountability. While several methods exist to watermark models behind APIs, embedding watermark strategies directly into model weights that are later reflected in the outputs of the model is challenging. In this study we propose a strategy to finetune a pair of low-rank adapters of a model, one serving as the text-generating model, and the other as the detector, so that a subtle watermark is embedded into the text generated by the first model and simultaneously optimized for detectability by the second. In this way, the watermarking strategy is fully learned end-to-end. This process imposes an optimization challenge, as balancing watermark robustness, naturalness, and task performance requires trade-offs. We discuss strategies on how to optimize this min-max objective and present results showing the effect of this modification to instruction finetuning.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 20 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2025.

Builds on

20 of 23 references.

Closest ancestors · 15

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Learning to Watermark LLM-generated Text via Reinforcement Learning13 Mar
  2. 2024Watermark Stealing in Large Language Models29 Feb
  3. 2023On the Learnability of Watermarks for Language Models7 Dec
  4. 2023Watermarks in the Sand: Impossibility of Strong Watermarking for Generative Models7 Nov
  5. 2023Publicly-Detectable Watermarking for Language Models27 Oct
  6. 2023A Semantic Invariant Robust Watermark for Large Language Models10 Oct
  7. 2023Unbiased Watermark for Large Language Models22 Sep
  8. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models28 Jul
  9. 2023Three Bricks to Consolidate Watermarks for Large Language Models26 Jul
  10. 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Text30 Jun
  11. 2023Undetectable Watermarks for Language Models25 May
  12. 2023Who Wrote this Code? Watermarking for Code Generation24 May
3 more
  1. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defense23 Mar
  2. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?17 Mar
  3. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Models24 Jan

Other references · 5

  1. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  2. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  3. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 263
  4. 2024Generalized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Offline Alignmentcited by 157
  5. 2020Adversarial Watermarking Transformer: Towards Tracing Text Provenance with Data Hidingcited by 130

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025MarkTune: Improving the Quality-Detectability Trade-off in Open-Weight LLM Watermarking
  2. 2024Provably Robust Watermarks for Open-Source Language Models
  3. 2024PostMark: A Robust Blackbox Watermark for Large Language Models
  4. 2025Learning to Watermark: A Selective Watermarking Framework for Large Language Models via Multi-Objective Optimization
  5. 2025GaussMark: A Practical Approach for Structural Watermarking of Language Models
  6. 2024Theoretically Grounded Framework for LLM Watermarking: A Distribution-Adaptive Approach
  7. 2024Token-Specific Watermarking with Enhanced Detectability and Semantic Coherence for Large Language Models
  8. 2025PRO: Enabling Precise and Robust Text Watermark for Open-Source LLMs