mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sigma: A dataset for text-to-code semantic parsing with statistical analysis

arXiv 2504.04301 ↗First posted 5 Apr 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.DBcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the domain of semantic parsing, significant progress has been achieved in Text-to-SQL and question-answering tasks, both of which focus on extracting information from data sources in their native formats. However, the inherent constraints of their formal meaning representations, such as SQL programming language or basic logical forms, hinder their ability to analyze data from various perspectives, such as conducting statistical analyses. To address this limitation and inspire research in this field, we design SIGMA, a new dataset for Text-to-Code semantic parsing with statistical analysis. SIGMA comprises 6000 questions with corresponding Python code labels, spanning across 160 databases. Half of the questions involve query types, which return information in its original format, while the remaining 50% are statistical analysis questions, which perform statistical operations on the data. The Python code labels in our dataset cover 4 types of query types and 40 types of statistical analysis patterns. We evaluated the SIGMA dataset using three different baseline models: LGESQL, SmBoP, and SLSQL. The experimental results show that the LGESQL model with ELECTRA outperforms all other models, achieving 83.37% structure accuracy. In terms of execution accuracy, the SmBoP model, when combined with GraPPa and T5, reaches 76.38%.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2025.

Builds on

16 of 26 references.

References · 16

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
  4. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,554
  5. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,139
  6. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 687
  7. 2019RAT-SQL: Relation-Aware Schema Encoding and Linking for Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 424
  8. 2017Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documentscited by 190
  9. 2019CoSQL: A Conversational Text-to-SQL Challenge Towards Cross-Domain Natural Language Interfaces to Databasescited by 185
  10. 2020GraPPa: Grammar-Augmented Pre-Training for Table Semantic Parsingcited by 171
  11. 2018Learning to Mine Aligned Code and Natural Language Pairs from Stack Overflowcited by 165
  12. 2019SParC: Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing in Contextcited by 144
4 more
  1. 2021LGESQL: Line Graph Enhanced Text-to-SQL Model with Mixed Local and Non-Local Relationscited by 119
  2. 2017Learning a Neural Semantic Parser from User Feedbackcited by 99
  3. 2020SmBoP: Semi-autoregressive Bottom-up Semantic Parsingcited by 97
  4. 2016Latent Predictor Networks for Code Generationcited by 73

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.