mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Investigating Affective Use and Emotional Well-being on ChatGPT

arXiv 2504.03888 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2025cs.HC cs.AIcited by 38

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As AI chatbots see increased adoption and integration into everyday life, questions have been raised about the potential impact of human-like or anthropomorphic AI on users. In this work, we investigate the extent to which interactions with ChatGPT (with a focus on Advanced Voice Mode) may impact users' emotional well-being, behaviors and experiences through two parallel studies. To study the affective use of AI chatbots, we perform large-scale automated analysis of ChatGPT platform usage in a privacy-preserving manner, analyzing over 3 million conversations for affective cues and surveying over 4,000 users on their perceptions of ChatGPT. To investigate whether there is a relationship between model usage and emotional well-being, we conduct an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved randomized controlled trial (RCT) on close to 1,000 participants over 28 days, examining changes in their emotional well-being as they interact with ChatGPT under different experimental settings. In both on-platform data analysis and the RCT, we observe that very high usage correlates with increased self-reported indicators of dependence. From our RCT, we find that the impact of voice-based interactions on emotional well-being to be highly nuanced, and influenced by factors such as the user's initial emotional state and total usage duration. Overall, our analysis reveals that a small number of users are responsible for a disproportionate share of the most affective cues.

Key facts. Cited by 38 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 10; 2026: 28.

38 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Expressing stigma and inappropriate responses prevents LLMs from safely replacing mental health providerscited by 69
  2. 2026Characterizing Delusional Spirals through Human-LLM Chat Logscited by 23
  3. 2025Technological folie `a deux: Feedback Loops Between AI Chatbots and Mental Illnesscited by 15
  4. 2026Sycophantic AI makes human interaction feel more effortful and less satisfying over timecited by 12
  5. 2025MindEval: Benchmarking Language Models on Multi-turn Mental Health Supportcited by 10
  6. 2025How Individual Traits and Language Styles Shape Preferences In Open-ended User-LLM Interaction: A Preliminary Studycited by 7
  7. 2026Seven simple steps for log analysis in AI systemscited by 6
  8. 2026ComBodied Agents: a New Paradigm of Human-Centric Agentic AIcited by 5
  9. 2025Being Kind Isn't Always Being Safe: Diagnosing Affective Hallucination in LLMscited by 3
  10. 2025Detecting and Preventing Harmful Behaviors in AI Companions: Development and Evaluation of the SHIELD Supervisory Systemcited by 3
  11. 2025Neural Transparency: Mechanistic Interpretability Interfaces for Anticipating Model Behaviors for Personalized AIcited by 3
  12. 2025When AI Gives Advice: Evaluating AI and Human Responses to Online Advice-Seeking for Well-Beingcited by 3
26 more
  1. 2026MindGuard: Guardrail Classifiers for Multi-Turn Mental Health Supportcited by 3
  2. 2026Disclosure By Design: Identity Transparency as a Behavioural Property of Conversational AI Modelscited by 3
  3. 2025What Does 'Human-Centred AI' Mean?cited by 2
  4. 2026Understanding Usage and Engagement in AI-Powered Scientific Research Tools: The Asta Interaction Datasetcited by 2
  5. 2026CharacterFlywheel: Scaling Iterative Improvement of Engaging and Steerable LLMs in Productioncited by 1
  6. 2026Discourse Diversity in Multi-Turn Empathic Dialoguecited by 1
  7. 2026HEART-Bench: Do LLM Agents Exhibit Human-like Psychology?cited by 1
  8. 2026Caring Without Feeling: Affective Dynamics as the Control Layer of Human-AI Agent Collaborationcited by 1
  9. 2026TRACE: Temporal Relationship-Aware Conversational Entrainment Detection in Dyadic Speechcited by 1
  10. 2025Emotionally Vulnerable Subtype of Internet Gaming Disorder: Measuring and Exploring the Pathology of Problematic Generative AI Usecited by 0
  11. 2026Generative Confidants: How do People Experience Trust in Emotional Support from Generative AI?cited by 0
  12. 2026Visual Affect Analysis: Predicting Emotions of Image Viewers with Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
  13. 2026Mapping generative AI use in the human brain: divergent neural, academic, and mental health profiles of functional versus socio emotional AI usecited by 0
  14. 2026Spontaneous Persuasion: An Audit of Model Persuasiveness in Everyday Conversationscited by 0
  15. 2026How Value Induction Reshapes LLM Behaviourcited by 0
  16. 2026Playing Games with My Heart: An Evaluation of AI Companion Appscited by 0
  17. 2026How Early Adopters Used Generative AI Worldwide: Variation by Country Income and Languagecited by 0
  18. 2026VET: A Framework for Analyzing AI Discoursecited by 0
  19. 2026Stumbling Into AI Emotional Dependence: How Routine AI Interactions Reshape Human Connectioncited by 0
  20. 2026Examining Human-Like Behaviors in LLMs: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Model Behaviors, User Factors, and System Promptscited by 0
  21. 2026Alignment Plausibility: A New Standard for Assuring AI in Healthcarecited by 0
  22. 2026Rater State Bias in RLHF Preference Data: An Audit Frameworkcited by 0
  23. 2026Studying People to Study AI: Expert Perspectives on the Epistemic Fit and Barriers of Human Research in AI Safety & Ethicscited by 0
  24. 2026Safety Nudges: User-Facing Interventions for Real-Time AI Risk Awarenesscited by 0
  25. 2026Right Words, Wrong Moment: A Clinician-Grounded Analysis of Distress in 19,930 Conversations between Young People and ChatGPTcited by 0
  26. 2026RELATE: An Evaluation Framework for measuring Relational Orientation of Large Language Modelscited by 0