mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SHapley Estimated Explanation (SHEP): A Fast Post-Hoc Attribution Method for Interpreting Intelligent Fault Diagnosis

arXiv 2504.03773 ↗First posted 3 Apr 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite significant progress in intelligent fault diagnosis (IFD), the lack of interpretability remains a critical barrier to practical industrial applications, driving the growth of interpretability research in IFD. Post-hoc interpretability has gained popularity due to its ability to preserve network flexibility and scalability without modifying model structures. However, these methods often yield suboptimal time-domain explanations. Recently, combining domain transform with SHAP has improved interpretability by extending explanations to more informative domains. Nonetheless, the computational expense of SHAP, exacerbated by increased dimensions from domain transforms, remains a major challenge. To address this, we propose patch-wise attribution and SHapley Estimated Explanation (SHEP). Patch-wise attribution reduces feature dimensions at the cost of explanation granularity, while SHEP simplifies subset enumeration to approximate SHAP, reducing complexity from exponential to linear. Together, these methods significantly enhance SHAP's computational efficiency, providing feasibility for real-time interpretation in monitoring tasks. Extensive experiments confirm SHEP's efficiency, interpretability, and reliability in approximating SHAP. Additionally, with open-source code, SHEP has the potential to serve as a benchmark for post-hoc interpretability in IFD. The code is available on https://github.com/ChenQian0618/SHEP.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2025.

Builds on

16 of 55 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  4. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  5. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  6. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
  7. 2020A Survey on Neural Network Interpretabilitycited by 291
  8. 2018Visual Interpretability for Deep Learning: a Surveycited by 155
  9. 2019Explaining Deep Neural Networks with a Polynomial Time Algorithm for Shapley Values Approximationcited by 115
  10. 2019Evaluating Explanation Methods for Deep Learning in Securitycited by 38
  11. 2021Fully Learnable Deep Wavelet Transform for Unsupervised Monitoring of High-Frequency Time Seriescited by 29
  12. 2019WaveletKernelNet: An Interpretable Deep Neural Network for Industrial Intelligent Diagnosiscited by 23
4 more
  1. 2023Does Your Model Think Like an Engineer? Explainable AI for Bearing Fault Detection with Deep Learningcited by 7
  2. 2024Interpreting What Typical Fault Signals Look Like via Prototype-matchingcited by 2
  3. 2021Explainable AI (XAI) for PHM of Industrial Asset: A State-of-The-Art, PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Reviewcited by 1
  4. 2025CS-SHAP: Extending SHAP to Cyclic-Spectral Domain for Better Interpretability of Intelligent Fault Diagnosiscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.