mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CS-SHAP: Extending SHAP to Cyclic-Spectral Domain for Better Interpretability of Intelligent Fault Diagnosis

arXiv 2502.06424 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural networks (NNs), with their powerful nonlinear mapping and end-to-end capabilities, are widely applied in mechanical intelligent fault diagnosis (IFD). However, as typical black-box models, they pose challenges in understanding their decision basis and logic, limiting their deployment in high-reliability scenarios. Hence, various methods have been proposed to enhance the interpretability of IFD. Among these, post-hoc approaches can provide explanations without changing model architecture, preserving its flexibility and scalability. However, existing post-hoc methods often suffer from limitations in explanation forms. They either require preprocessing that disrupts the end-to-end nature or overlook fault mechanisms, leading to suboptimal explanations. To address these issues, we derived the cyclic-spectral (CS) transform and proposed the CS-SHAP by extending Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) to the CS domain. CS-SHAP can evaluate contributions from both carrier and modulation frequencies, aligning more closely with fault mechanisms and delivering clearer and more accurate explanations. Three datasets are utilized to validate the superior interpretability of CS-SHAP, ensuring its correctness, reproducibility, and practical performance. With open-source code and outstanding interpretability, CS-SHAP has the potential to be widely adopted and become the post-hoc interpretability benchmark in IFD, even in other classification tasks. The code is available on https://github.com/ChenQian0618/CS-SHAP.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2025.

Builds on

5 of 46 references.

References · 5

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2020A Survey on Neural Network Interpretabilitycited by 291
  3. 2023Does Your Model Think Like an Engineer? Explainable AI for Bearing Fault Detection with Deep Learningcited by 7
  4. 2022TFN: An Interpretable Neural Network with Time-Frequency Transform Embedded for Intelligent Fault Diagnosiscited by 3
  5. 2024Interpreting What Typical Fault Signals Look Like via Prototype-matchingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.