Does Your Model Think Like an Engineer? Explainable AI for Bearing Fault Detection with Deep Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep Learning has already been successfully applied to analyze industrial sensor data in a variety of relevant use cases. However, the opaque nature of many well-performing methods poses a major obstacle for real-world deployment. Explainable AI (XAI) and especially feature attribution techniques promise to enable insights about how such models form their decision. But the plain application of such methods often fails to provide truly informative and problem-specific insights to domain experts. In this work, we focus on the specific task of detecting faults in rolling element bearings from vibration signals. We propose a novel and domain-specific feature attribution framework that allows us to evaluate how well the underlying logic of a model corresponds with expert reasoning. Utilizing the framework we are able to validate the trustworthiness and to successfully anticipate the generalization ability of different well-performing deep learning models. Our methodology demonstrates how signal processing tools can effectively be used to enhance Explainable AI techniques and acts as a template for similar problems.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2023.
Builds on
14 of 30 references.
References · 14
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
- 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 542
- 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 341
- 2020Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanationcited by 218
- 2019Explainable Machine Learning in Deploymentcited by 210
- 2019An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanationcited by 71
- 2018Explanation Methods in Deep Learning: Users, Values, Concerns and Challengescited by 49
- 2020Does Explainable Artificial Intelligence Improve Human Decision-Making?cited by 49
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4.
7 papers.
- 2024Interpretable Prognostics with Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 6
- 2024Provably Better Explanations with Optimized Aggregation of Feature Attributionscited by 6
- 2024Explainable fault and severity classification for rolling element bearings using Kolmogorov-Arnold networkscited by 2
- 2025CS-SHAP: Extending SHAP to Cyclic-Spectral Domain for Better Interpretability of Intelligent Fault Diagnosiscited by 1
- 2025SHapley Estimated Explanation (SHEP): A Fast Post-Hoc Attribution Method for Interpreting Intelligent Fault Diagnosiscited by 1
- 2025Why Uncertainty Calibration Matters for Reliable Perturbation-based Explanationscited by 0
- 2025Explainable AI guided unsupervised fault diagnostics for high-voltage circuit breakerscited by 0
- 2025Explainable AI guided unsupervised fault diagnostics for high-voltage circuit breakers25 Jul 2025
- 2025Why Uncertainty Calibration Matters for Reliable Perturbation-based Explanations24 Jun 2025
- 2025SHapley Estimated Explanation (SHEP): A Fast Post-Hoc Attribution Method for Interpreting Intelligent Fault Diagnosis3 Apr 2025
- 2025CS-SHAP: Extending SHAP to Cyclic-Spectral Domain for Better Interpretability of Intelligent Fault Diagnosis10 Feb 2025
- 2024Explainable fault and severity classification for rolling element bearings using Kolmogorov-Arnold networks2 Dec 2024
- 2024Provably Better Explanations with Optimized Aggregation of Feature Attributions7 Jun 2024
- 2024Interpretable Prognostics with Concept Bottleneck Models27 May 2024