A metrological framework for uncertainty evaluation in machine learning classification models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning (ML) classification models are increasingly being used in a wide range of applications where it is important that predictions are accompanied by uncertainties, including in climate and earth observation, medical diagnosis and bioaerosol monitoring. The output of an ML classification model is a type of categorical variable known as a nominal property in the International Vocabulary of Metrology (VIM). However, concepts related to uncertainty evaluation for nominal properties are not defined in the VIM, nor is such evaluation addressed by the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM). In this paper we propose a metrological conceptual uncertainty evaluation framework for nominal properties. This framework is based on probability mass functions and summary statistics thereof, and it is applicable to ML classification. We also illustrate its use in the context of two applications that exemplify the issues and have significant societal impact, namely, climate and earth observation and medical diagnosis. Our framework would enable an extension of the GUM to uncertainty for nominal properties, which would make both applicable to ML classification models.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2025.
Builds on
12 of 89 references.
References · 12
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
- 2018Bag of Tricks for Image Classification with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 430
- 2020Hands-on Bayesian Neural Networks -- a Tutorial for Deep Learning Userscited by 336
- 2020Deep Learning for ECG Analysis: Benchmarks and Insights from PTB-XLcited by 158
- 2022Analysis and Comparison of Classification Metricscited by 16
- 2020Uncertainty Quantification for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 7
- 2021Robustness of convolutional neural networks to physiological ECG noisecited by 7
- 2021Continental-scale land cover mapping at 10 m resolution over Europe (ELC10)cited by 4
- 2021Aleatoric uncertainty for Errors-in-Variables models in deep regressioncited by 4
- 2025An uncertainty-aware Bayesian framework for machine learning classification models: A case study in land cover classificationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Reality Check: A New Evaluation Ecosystem Is Necessary to Understand AI's Real World Effectscited by 18
- 2025A systematic evaluation of uncertainty quantification techniques in deep learning: a case study in photoplethysmography signal analysiscited by 1
- 2026Extending confidence calibration to generalised measures of variationcited by 1
- 2026TRACE: A Metrologically-Grounded Engineering Framework for Trustworthy Agentic AI Systems in Operationally Critical Domainscited by 1
- 2026TRACE: A Metrologically-Grounded Engineering Framework for Trustworthy Agentic AI Systems in Operationally Critical Domains5 May 2026
- 2026Extending confidence calibration to generalised measures of variation13 Feb 2026
- 2025A systematic evaluation of uncertainty quantification techniques in deep learning: a case study in photoplethysmography signal analysis31 Oct 2025
- 2025Reality Check: A New Evaluation Ecosystem Is Necessary to Understand AI's Real World Effects24 May 2025