mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An uncertainty-aware Bayesian framework for machine learning classification models: A case study in land cover classification

arXiv 2503.21510 ↗First posted 27 Mar 2025cs.LG cs.CV stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring that predictions of machine learning (ML) classification models are accompanied by uncertainty estimates is one of the main pillars of trustworthy AI. Current research in uncertainty quantification focuses mainly on epistemic uncertainty of the ML model, but rarely takes account of input measurement uncertainty, which is vital for traceability in metrology. In this work we propose a Bayesian framework for generative ML classification models that takes account of input measurement uncertainty. We take the specific case of a Bayesian quadratic discriminant analysis (BQDA) model, and apply it to metrological land cover datasets from Copernicus Sentinel-2 from 2020 and 2021. We benchmark the performance of the model against more popular classification models used in land cover maps such as random forests and neural networks. To validate and assess the generalisability of such a model, we also run simulations over synthetic classification data, varying distribution type and strength of the input measurement noise. We find for both real and synthetic data, the BQDA model presented is more trustworthy, in the sense that it is more interpretable, explicitly models the input measurement uncertainty, and maintains predictive performance of class probability outputs across datasets over different domains and sizes, whilst also being more computationally efficient.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2025.

Builds on

10 of 46 references.

References · 10

  1. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
  2. 2020Hands-on Bayesian Neural Networks -- a Tutorial for Deep Learning Userscited by 338
  3. 2020Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networkscited by 231
  4. 2019Macro F1 and Macro F1cited by 70
  5. 2013Confidence Intervals for Random Forests: The Jackknife and the Infinitesimal Jackknifecited by 44
  6. 2021Continental-scale land cover mapping at 10 m resolution over Europe (ELC10)cited by 4
  7. 2021Aleatoric uncertainty for Errors-in-Variables models in deep regressioncited by 4
  8. 2024Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in the Context of Metrologycited by 4
  9. 2021Quadratic Discriminant Analysis by Projectioncited by 3
  10. 2024Analytical results for uncertainty propagation through trained machine learning regression modelscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.