mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robustness of convolutional neural networks to physiological ECG noise

arXiv 2108.01995 ↗First posted 2 Aug 2021eess.SP cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the most widespread diagnostic tools in healthcare and supports the diagnosis of cardiovascular disorders. Deep learning methods are a successful and popular technique to detect indications of disorders from an ECG signal. However, there are open questions around the robustness of these methods to various factors, including physiological ECG noise. In this study we generate clean and noisy versions of an ECG dataset before applying Symmetric Projection Attractor Reconstruction (SPAR) and scalogram image transformations. A pretrained convolutional neural network is trained using transfer learning to classify these image transforms. For the clean ECG dataset, F1 scores for SPAR attractor and scalogram transforms were 0.70 and 0.79, respectively, and the scores decreased by less than 0.05 for the noisy ECG datasets. Notably, when the network trained on clean data was used to classify the noisy datasets, performance decreases of up to 0.18 in F1 scores were seen. However, when the network trained on the noisy data was used to classify the clean dataset, the performance decrease was less than 0.05. We conclude that physiological ECG noise impacts classification using deep learning methods and careful consideration should be given to the inclusion of noisy ECG signals in the training data when developing supervised networks for ECG classification.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2021.

Builds on

5 of 38 references.

References · 5

  1. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  2. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  3. 2019Automatic diagnosis of the 12-lead ECG using a deep neural networkcited by 164
  4. 2020Deep Learning for ECG Analysis: Benchmarks and Insights from PTB-XLcited by 158
  5. 2019Opportunities and Challenges of Deep Learning Methods for Electrocardiogram Data: A Systematic Reviewcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

7 papers.