Robustness of convolutional neural networks to physiological ECG noise
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the most widespread diagnostic tools in healthcare and supports the diagnosis of cardiovascular disorders. Deep learning methods are a successful and popular technique to detect indications of disorders from an ECG signal. However, there are open questions around the robustness of these methods to various factors, including physiological ECG noise. In this study we generate clean and noisy versions of an ECG dataset before applying Symmetric Projection Attractor Reconstruction (SPAR) and scalogram image transformations. A pretrained convolutional neural network is trained using transfer learning to classify these image transforms. For the clean ECG dataset, F1 scores for SPAR attractor and scalogram transforms were 0.70 and 0.79, respectively, and the scores decreased by less than 0.05 for the noisy ECG datasets. Notably, when the network trained on clean data was used to classify the noisy datasets, performance decreases of up to 0.18 in F1 scores were seen. However, when the network trained on the noisy data was used to classify the clean dataset, the performance decrease was less than 0.05. We conclude that physiological ECG noise impacts classification using deep learning methods and careful consideration should be given to the inclusion of noisy ECG signals in the training data when developing supervised networks for ECG classification.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2021.
Builds on
5 of 38 references.
References · 5
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
- 2019Automatic diagnosis of the 12-lead ECG using a deep neural networkcited by 164
- 2020Deep Learning for ECG Analysis: Benchmarks and Insights from PTB-XLcited by 158
- 2019Opportunities and Challenges of Deep Learning Methods for Electrocardiogram Data: A Systematic Reviewcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
7 papers.
- 2022GeoECG: Data Augmentation via Wasserstein Geodesic Perturbation for Robust Electrocardiogram Predictioncited by 8
- 2025A metrological framework for uncertainty evaluation in machine learning classification modelscited by 4
- 2024Analytical results for uncertainty propagation through trained machine learning regression modelscited by 3
- 2023Robustness Enhancement in Neural Networks with Alpha-Stable Training Noisecited by 2
- 2023Benchmarking the Impact of Noise on Deep Learning-based Classification of Atrial Fibrillation in 12-Lead ECGcited by 0
- 2024Continuous Wavelet Transformation and VGG16 Deep Neural Network for Stress Classification in PPG Signalscited by 0
- 2025Multimodal signal fusion for stress detection using deep neural networks: a novel approach for converting 1D signals to unified 2D imagescited by 0
- 2025Multimodal signal fusion for stress detection using deep neural networks: a novel approach for converting 1D signals to unified 2D images17 Sep 2025
- 2025A metrological framework for uncertainty evaluation in machine learning classification models4 Apr 2025
- 2024Continuous Wavelet Transformation and VGG16 Deep Neural Network for Stress Classification in PPG Signals17 Oct 2024
- 2024Analytical results for uncertainty propagation through trained machine learning regression models17 Apr 2024
- 2023Robustness Enhancement in Neural Networks with Alpha-Stable Training Noise17 Nov 2023
- 2023Benchmarking the Impact of Noise on Deep Learning-based Classification of Atrial Fibrillation in 12-Lead ECG24 Mar 2023
- 2022GeoECG: Data Augmentation via Wasserstein Geodesic Perturbation for Robust Electrocardiogram Prediction2 Aug 2022