Fast Fourier Correlation is a Highly Efficient and Accurate Feature Attribution Algorithm from the Perspective of Control Theory and Game Theory
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The study of neural networks from the perspective of Fourier features has garnered significant attention. While existing analytical research suggests that neural networks tend to learn low-frequency features, a clear attribution method for identifying the specific learned Fourier features has remained elusive. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel Fourier feature attribution method grounded in signal decomposition theory. Additionally, we analyze the differences between game-theoretic attribution metrics for Fourier and spatial domain features, demonstrating that game-theoretic evaluation metrics are better suited for Fourier-based feature attribution. Our experiments show that Fourier feature attribution exhibits superior feature selection capabilities compared to spatial domain attribution methods. For instance, in the case of Vision Transformers (ViTs) on the ImageNet dataset, only 8% of the Fourier features are required to maintain the original predictions for 80% of the samples. Furthermore, we compare the specificity of features identified by our method against traditional spatial domain attribution methods. Results reveal that Fourier features exhibit greater intra-class concentration and inter-class distinctiveness, indicating their potential for more efficient classification and explainable AI algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2025.
Builds on
40 of 53 references.
References · 40
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,170
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
- 2019Stand-Alone Self-Attention in Vision Modelscited by 542
- 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 542
28 more
- 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 467
- 2021Attention is Not All You Need: Pure Attention Loses Rank Doubly Exponentially with Depthcited by 411
- 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 309
- 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
- 2017Real Time Image Saliency for Black Box Classifierscited by 246
- 2019Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blamecited by 215
- 2019Full-Gradient Representation for Neural Network Visualizationcited by 189
- 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 177
- 2018Training behavior of deep neural network in frequency domaincited by 174
- 2017Visualizing Deep Neural Network Decisions: Prediction Difference Analysiscited by 166
- 2022The Disagreement Problem in Explainable Machine Learning: A Practitioner's Perspectivecited by 156
- 2020Debugging Tests for Model Explanationscited by 146
- 2022Anti-Oversmoothing in Deep Vision Transformers via the Fourier Domain Analysis: From Theory to Practicecited by 136
- 2021Do Feature Attribution Methods Correctly Attribute Features?cited by 98
- 2022Impossibility Theorems for Feature Attributioncited by 78
- 2022GraphFramEx: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Explainability Methods for Graph Neural Networkscited by 57
- 2017Towards better understanding of gradient-based attribution methods for Deep Neural Networkscited by 51
- 2020IROF: a low resource evaluation metric for explanation methodscited by 45
- 2021Order in the Court: Explainable AI Methods Prone to Disagreementcited by 36
- 2020Deep frequency principle towards understanding why deeper learning is fastercited by 30
- 2023GLOBE-CE: A Translation-Based Approach for Global Counterfactual Explanationscited by 27
- 2024Manifold Integrated Gradients: Riemannian Geometry for Feature Attributioncited by 21
- 2022Attribution-based Explanations that Provide Recourse Cannot be Robustcited by 20
- 2023On the Robustness of Removal-Based Feature Attributionscited by 18
- 2024Which Frequencies do CNNs Need? Emergent Bottleneck Structure in Feature Learningcited by 9
- 2023Learning Time-Invariant Representations for Individual Neurons from Population Dynamicscited by 8
- 2024Provably Better Explanations with Optimized Aggregation of Feature Attributionscited by 6
- 2021Frequency Principle in Deep Learning Beyond Gradient-descent-based Trainingcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.