Advancing AI-Scientist Understanding: Multi-Agent LLMs with Interpretable Physics Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are playing an increasingly important role in physics research by assisting with symbolic manipulation, numerical computation, and scientific reasoning. However, ensuring the reliability, transparency, and interpretability of their outputs remains a major challenge. In this work, we introduce a novel multi-agent LLM physicist framework that fosters collaboration between AI and human scientists through three key modules: a reasoning module, an interpretation module, and an AI-scientist interaction module. Recognizing that effective physics reasoning demands logical rigor, quantitative accuracy, and alignment with established theoretical models, we propose an interpretation module that employs a team of specialized LLM agents-including summarizers, model builders, visualization tools, and testers-to systematically structure LLM outputs into transparent, physically grounded science models. A case study demonstrates that our approach significantly improves interpretability, enables systematic validation, and enhances human-AI collaboration in physics problem-solving and discovery. Our work bridges free-form LLM reasoning with interpretable, executable models for scientific analysis, enabling more transparent and verifiable AI-augmented research.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 15 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2025.
Builds on
15 of 21 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Physics Reasoner: Knowledge-Augmented Reasoning for Solving Physics Problems with Large Language Models18 Dec
- 2023NEWTON: Are Large Language Models Capable of Physical Reasoning?10 Oct
Other references · 13
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,462
- 2023SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 256
- 2019Gradio: Hassle-Free Sharing and Testing of ML Models in the Wildcited by 178
- 2020Unit Test Case Generation with Transformers and Focal Contextcited by 118
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Scientific Large Language Models and Their Applications in Scientific Discoverycited by 96
- 2023Can Large Language Models Explain Themselves? A Study of LLM-Generated Self-Explanationscited by 90
- 2024UICoder: Finetuning Large Language Models to Generate User Interface Code through Automated Feedbackcited by 27
- 2024Quantum Many-Body Physics Calculations with Large Language Modelscited by 17
- 2023Using Large Language Model to Solve and Explain Physics Word Problems Approaching Human Levelcited by 16
- 2023Towards Verifiable Text Generation with Symbolic Referencescited by 13
- 2024Enhancing LLMs for Physics Problem-Solving using Reinforcement Learning with Human-AI Feedbackcited by 6
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025From AI for Science to Agentic Science: A Survey on Autonomous Scientific Discoverycited by 77
- 2025AutoLabs: Cognitive Multi-Agent Systems with Self-Correction for Autonomous Chemical Experimentationcited by 15
- 2025PhySense: Principle-Based Physics Reasoning Benchmarking for Large Language Modelscited by 4
- 2026When Does Critique Improve AI-Assisted Theoretical Physics? SCALAR: Structured Critic--Actor Loop for Agentic Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Solver Agent: an Agentic AI Framework for Theoretical Physics Computations Applied to F-theory Uplifts of O3-planes and S-foldscited by 0
- 2026Solver Agent: an Agentic AI Framework for Theoretical Physics Computations Applied to F-theory Uplifts of O3-planes and S-folds28 Sep 2026
- 2026When Does Critique Improve AI-Assisted Theoretical Physics? SCALAR: Structured Critic--Actor Loop for Agentic Reasoning7 May 2026
- 2025AutoLabs: Cognitive Multi-Agent Systems with Self-Correction for Autonomous Chemical Experimentation30 Sep 2025
- 2025From AI for Science to Agentic Science: A Survey on Autonomous Scientific Discovery18 Aug 2025
- 2025PhySense: Principle-Based Physics Reasoning Benchmarking for Large Language Models30 May 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Can Theoretical Physics Research Benefit from Language Agents?
- 2025Towards Scientific Intelligence: A Survey of LLM-based Scientific Agents
- 2025Large Physics Models: Towards a collaborative approach with Large Language Models and Foundation Models
- 2025PhysicsEval: Inference-Time Techniques to Improve the Reasoning Proficiency of Large Language Models on Physics Problems
- 2026Scientific Logicality Enriched Methodology for LLM Reasoning: A Practice in Physics
- 2026Think like a Scientist: Physics-guided LLM Agent for Equation Discovery
- 2024Improving Physics Reasoning in Large Language Models Using Mixture of Refinement Agents
- 2025MM-Agent: LLM as Agents for Real-world Mathematical Modeling Problem