mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Nuclear Microreactor Control with Deep Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2504.00156 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2025eess.SY cs.LG cs.SYcited by 1

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL for energy, networks and operations

Abstract (arXiv)

The economic feasibility of nuclear microreactors will depend on minimizing operating costs through advancements in autonomous control, especially when these microreactors are operating alongside other types of energy systems (e.g., renewable energy). This study explores the application of deep reinforcement learning (RL) for real-time drum control in microreactors, exploring performance in regard to load-following scenarios. By leveraging a point kinetics model with thermal and xenon feedback, we first establish a baseline using a single-output RL agent, then compare it against a traditional proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller. This study demonstrates that RL controllers, including both single- and multi-agent RL (MARL) frameworks, can achieve similar or even superior load-following performance as traditional PID control across a range of load-following scenarios. In short transients, the RL agent was able to reduce the tracking error rate in comparison to PID. Over extended 300-minute load-following scenarios in which xenon feedback becomes a dominant factor, PID maintained better accuracy, but RL still remained within a 1% error margin despite being trained only on short-duration scenarios. This highlights RL's strong ability to generalize and extrapolate to longer, more complex transients, affording substantial reductions in training costs and reduced overfitting. Furthermore, when control was extended to multiple drums, MARL enabled independent drum control as well as maintained reactor symmetry constraints without sacrificing performance -- an objective that standard single-agent RL could not learn. We also found that, as increasing levels of Gaussian noise were added to the power measurements, the RL controllers were able to maintain lower error rates than PID, and to do so with less control effort.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL for energy, networks and operations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 12 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2025.

Builds on

12 of 62 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
  3. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
  4. 2022Diffusion Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,114
  5. 2020PettingZoo: Gym for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 220
  6. 2018Horizon: Facebook's Open Source Applied Reinforcement Learning Platformcited by 48
  7. 2021DeepThermal: Combustion Optimization for Thermal Power Generating Units Using Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 48
  8. 2022Controlling Commercial Cooling Systems Using Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
  9. 2020SuperSuit: Simple Microwrappers for Reinforcement Learning Environmentscited by 10
  10. 2023Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning-based Approach for Pressurized Water Reactor Optimizationcited by 5
  11. 2023Learning Continuous Control with Geometric Regularity from Robot Intrinsic Symmetrycited by 3
  12. 2024Multi-level Optimal Control with Neural Surrogate Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Multistep Criticality Search and Power Shaping in Microreactors with Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2024Control-Informed Reinforcement Learning for Chemical Processes
  3. 2026Reinforcement Learning-based Control via Y-wise Affine Neural Networks: Comparative Case Studies for Chemical Processes
  4. 2024PC-Gym: Benchmark Environments For Process Control Problems
  5. 2026Augmenting PID Control with Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Hybrid Approach to the Industrial Benchmark
  6. 2025Safe Deployment of Offline Reinforcement Learning via Input Convex Action Correction
  7. 2025Controlling dynamics of stochastic systems with deep reinforcement learning
  8. 2026Timescale Separation Enables Deep Reinforcement Learning Control of Rotating Detonation Engine Mode Transitions