mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GAL-MAD: Towards Explainable Anomaly Detection in Microservice Applications Using Graph Attention Networks

arXiv 2504.00058 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2025cs.SE cs.AI cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The transition to microservices has revolutionized software architectures, offering enhanced scalability and modularity. However, the distributed and dynamic nature of microservices introduces complexities in ensuring system reliability, making anomaly detection crucial for maintaining performance and functionality. Anomalies stemming from network and performance issues must be swiftly identified and addressed. Existing anomaly detection techniques often rely on statistical models or machine learning methods that struggle with the high-dimensional, interdependent data inherent in microservice applications. Current techniques and available datasets predominantly focus on system traces and logs, limiting their ability to support advanced detection models. This paper addresses these gaps by introducing the RS-Anomic dataset generated using the open-source RobotShop microservice application. The dataset captures multivariate performance metrics and response times under normal and anomalous conditions, encompassing ten types of anomalies. We propose a novel anomaly detection model called Graph Attention and LSTM-based Microservice Anomaly Detection (GAL-MAD), leveraging Graph Attention and Long Short-Term Memory architectures to capture spatial and temporal dependencies in microservices. We utilize SHAP values to localize anomalous services and identify root causes to enhance explainability. Experimental results demonstrate that GAL-MAD outperforms state-of-the-art models on the RS-Anomic dataset, achieving higher accuracy and recall across varying anomaly rates. The explanations provide actionable insights into service anomalies, which benefits system administrators.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2025.

Builds on

16 of 59 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  4. 2021Graph Neural Network-Based Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Seriescited by 301
  5. 2019MAD-GAN: Multivariate Anomaly Detection for Time Series Data with Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 176
  6. 2020Multivariate Time-series Anomaly Detection via Graph Attention Networkcited by 167
  7. 2020Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Reviewcited by 159
  8. 2015Evaluating Real-time Anomaly Detection Algorithms - the Numenta Anomaly Benchmarkcited by 88
  9. 2018Learning Deep Features for One-Class Classificationcited by 76
  10. 2017Unsupervised and Semi-supervised Anomaly Detection with LSTM Neural Networkscited by 40
  11. 2021MicroHECL: High-Efficient Root Cause Localization in Large-Scale Microservice Systemscited by 36
  12. 2024Root Cause Analysis In Microservice Using Neural Granger Causal Discoverycited by 32
4 more
  1. 2022CausalRCA: Causal Inference based Precise Fine-grained Root Cause Localization for Microservice Applicationscited by 24
  2. 2024BARO: Robust Root Cause Analysis for Microservices via Multivariate Bayesian Online Change Point Detectioncited by 22
  3. 2022Actionable and Interpretable Fault Localization for Recurring Failures in Online Service Systemscited by 19
  4. 2023TraceDiag: Adaptive, Interpretable, and Efficient Root Cause Analysis on Large-Scale Microservice Systemscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.