mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Enhancing Federated Learning Through Secure Cluster-Weighted Client Aggregation

arXiv 2503.22971 ↗First posted 29 Mar 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm in machine learning, enabling collaborative model training across decentralized devices without the need for raw data sharing. In FL, a global model is trained iteratively on local datasets residing on individual devices, each contributing to the model's improvement. However, the heterogeneous nature of these local datasets, stemming from diverse user behaviours, device capabilities, and data distributions, poses a significant challenge. The inherent heterogeneity in federated learning gives rise to various issues, including model performance discrepancies, convergence challenges, and potential privacy concerns. As the global model progresses through rounds of training, the disparities in local data quality and quantity can impede the overall effectiveness of federated learning systems. Moreover, maintaining fairness and privacy across diverse user groups becomes a paramount concern. To address this issue, this paper introduces a novel FL framework, ClusterGuardFL, that employs dissimilarity scores, k-means clustering, and reconciliation confidence scores to dynamically assign weights to client updates. The dissimilarity scores between global and local models guide the formation of clusters, with cluster size influencing the weight allocation. Within each cluster, a reconciliation confidence score is calculated for individual data points, and a softmax layer generates customized weights for clients. These weights are utilized in the aggregation process, enhancing the model's robustness and privacy. Experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed approach in achieving improved model performance in diverse datasets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2025.

Builds on

17 of 37 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,046
  3. 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 906
  4. 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 765
  5. 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
  6. 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 519
  7. 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 493
  8. 2020Adaptive Personalized Federated Learningcited by 358
  9. 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 346
  10. 2020Personalized Federated Learning: A Meta-Learning Approachcited by 312
  11. 2019A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learningcited by 288
  12. 2021Federated Learning for Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 252
5 more
  1. 2018Mitigating Sybils in Federated Learning Poisoningcited by 161
  2. 2021FairFed: Enabling Group Fairness in Federated Learningcited by 118
  3. 2020A Framework for Evaluating Gradient Leakage Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 64
  4. 2021Federated Learning over Wireless Device-to-Device Networks: Algorithms and Convergence Analysiscited by 51
  5. 2021Securing Federated Learning: A Covert Communication-based Approachcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.