Securing Federated Learning: A Covert Communication-based Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning Networks (FLNs) have been envisaged as a promising paradigm to collaboratively train models among mobile devices without exposing their local privacy data. Due to the need for frequent model updates and communications, FLNs are vulnerable to various attacks (e.g., eavesdropping attacks, inference attacks, poisoning attacks, and backdoor attacks). Balancing privacy protection with efficient distributed model training is a key challenge for FLNs. Existing countermeasures incur high computation costs and are only designed for specific attacks on FLNs. In this paper, we bridge this gap by proposing the Covert Communication-based Federated Learning (CCFL) approach. Based on the emerging communication security technique of covert communication which hides the existence of wireless communication activities, CCFL can degrade attackers' capability of extracting useful information from the FLN training protocol, which is a fundamental step for most existing attacks, and thereby holistically enhances the privacy of FLNs. We experimentally evaluate CCFL extensively under real-world settings in which the FL latency is optimized under given security requirements. Numerical results demonstrate the significant effectiveness of the proposed approach in terms of both training efficiency and communication security.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2022FedOBD: Opportunistic Block Dropout for Efficiently Training Large-scale Neural Networks through Federated Learningcited by 17
- 2024Threats and Defenses in Federated Learning Life Cycle: A Comprehensive Survey and Challengescited by 15
- 2022HFedMS: Heterogeneous Federated Learning with Memorable Data Semantics in Industrial Metaversecited by 14
- 2023Data-Agnostic Model Poisoning against Federated Learning: A Graph Autoencoder Approachcited by 9
- 2025Enhancing Federated Learning Through Secure Cluster-Weighted Client Aggregationcited by 0
- 2025Enhancing Federated Learning Through Secure Cluster-Weighted Client Aggregation29 Mar 2025
- 2024Threats and Defenses in Federated Learning Life Cycle: A Comprehensive Survey and Challenges9 Jul 2024
- 2023Data-Agnostic Model Poisoning against Federated Learning: A Graph Autoencoder Approach30 Nov 2023
- 2022HFedMS: Heterogeneous Federated Learning with Memorable Data Semantics in Industrial Metaverse7 Nov 2022
- 2022FedOBD: Opportunistic Block Dropout for Efficiently Training Large-scale Neural Networks through Federated Learning10 Aug 2022
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023A Survey of What to Share in Federated Learning: Perspectives on Model Utility, Privacy Leakage, and Communication Efficiency
- 2021PPFL: Privacy-preserving Federated Learning with Trusted Execution Environments
- 2024Analysis of Privacy Leakage in Federated Large Language Models
- 2024Federated Learning: Attacks, Defenses, Opportunities, and Challenges
- 2025FuSeFL: Fully Secure and Scalable Federated Learning
- 2025Federated Learning: A Survey on Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Intelligence
- 2024Providing Differential Privacy for Federated Learning Over Wireless: A Cross-layer Framework
- 2023Binary Federated Learning with Client-Level Differential Privacy