mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SUV: Scalable Large Language Model Copyright Compliance with Regularized Selective Unlearning

arXiv 2503.22948 ↗First posted 29 Mar 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 4

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed natural language processing by learning from massive datasets, yet this rapid progress has also drawn legal scrutiny, as the ability to unintentionally generate copyrighted content has already prompted several prominent lawsuits. In this work, we introduce SUV (Selective Unlearning for Verbatim data), a selective unlearning framework designed to prevent LLM from memorizing copyrighted content while preserving its overall utility. In detail, the proposed method constructs a dataset that captures instances of copyrighted infringement cases by the targeted LLM. With the dataset, we unlearn the content from the LLM by means of Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), which replaces the verbatim copyrighted content with plausible and coherent alternatives. Since DPO may hinder the LLM's performance in other unrelated tasks, we integrate gradient projection and Fisher information regularization to mitigate the degradation. We validate our approach using a large-scale dataset of 500 famous books (predominantly copyrighted works) and demonstrate that SUV significantly reduces verbatim memorization with negligible impact on the performance on unrelated tasks. Extensive experiments on both our dataset and public benchmarks confirm the scalability and efficacy of our approach, offering a promising solution for mitigating copyright risks in real-world LLM applications.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 61 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2025.

Builds on

61 of 78 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning8 Apr

Other references · 60

  1. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  3. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  4. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  5. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  6. 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,076
  7. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
  8. 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 755
  9. 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 705
  10. 2021Merging Models with Fisher-Weighted Averagingcited by 613
  11. 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 599
  12. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMscited by 507
38 more
  1. 2022Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Modelscited by 424
  2. 2023Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Modelscited by 415
  3. 2024LoRA+: Efficient Low Rank Adaptation of Large Modelscited by 365
  4. 2019Orthogonal Gradient Descent for Continual Learningcited by 361
  5. 2021Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine Unlearningcited by 360
  6. 2021Gradient Projection Memory for Continual Learningcited by 338
  7. 2022A Survey of Machine Unlearningcited by 298
  8. 2023Large Language Model Unlearningcited by 288
  9. 2024Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Modelscited by 247
  10. 2023Does Localization Inform Editing? Surprising Differences in Causality-Based Localization vs. Knowledge Editing in Language Modelscited by 237
  11. 2024SafeDecoding: Defending against Jailbreak Attacks via Safety-Aware Decodingcited by 233
  12. 2023In-Context Unlearning: Language Models as Few Shot Unlearnerscited by 214
  13. 2023Unlearn What You Want to Forget: Efficient Unlearning for LLMscited by 211
  14. 2021Fast Yet Effective Machine Unlearningcited by 209
  15. 2020Forgetting Outside the Box: Scrubbing Deep Networks of Information Accessible from Input-Output Observationscited by 171
  16. 2020Mixed-Privacy Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 158
  17. 2023Composing Parameter-Efficient Modules with Arithmetic Operationscited by 155
  18. 2023Emergent and Predictable Memorization in Large Language Modelscited by 147
  19. 2024Towards Safer Large Language Models through Machine Unlearningcited by 134
  20. 2023ProPILE: Probing Privacy Leakage in Large Language Modelscited by 127
  21. 2023Speak, Memory: An Archaeology of Books Known to ChatGPT/GPT-4cited by 123
  22. 2023Foundation Models and Fair Usecited by 112
  23. 2024Large Language Model Unlearning via Embedding-Corrupted Promptscited by 112
  24. 2023Copyright Violations and Large Language Modelscited by 108
  25. 2024SOUL: Unlocking the Power of Second-Order Optimization for LLM Unlearningcited by 104
  26. 2022Preventing Verbatim Memorization in Language Models Gives a False Sense of Privacycited by 97
  27. 2023On Provable Copyright Protection for Generative Modelscited by 97
  28. 2024Guardrail Baselines for Unlearning in LLMscited by 90
  29. 2023DEPN: Detecting and Editing Privacy Neurons in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 75
  30. 2023SILO Language Models: Isolating Legal Risk In a Nonparametric Datastorecited by 71
  31. 2021Memorization vs. Generalization: Quantifying Data Leakage in NLP Performance Evaluationcited by 69
  32. 2024Demystifying Verbatim Memorization in Large Language Modelscited by 55
  33. 2024Be like a Goldfish, Don't Memorize! Mitigating Memorization in Generative LLMscited by 50
  34. 2024Machine Unlearning in Generative AI: A Surveycited by 49
  35. 2024Challenging Forgets: Unveiling the Worst-Case Forget Sets in Machine Unlearningcited by 44
  36. 2024Evaluating Copyright Takedown Methods for Language Modelscited by 42
  37. 2025On the Trustworthiness of Generative Foundation Models: Guideline, Assessment, and Perspectivecited by 39
  38. 2024CopyBench: Measuring Literal and Non-Literal Reproduction of Copyright-Protected Text in Language Model Generationcited by 35

50 most cited of 60 All 60 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Protecting Privacy in Multimodal Large Language Models with MLLMU-Bench
  2. 2024Towards Robust and Parameter-Efficient Knowledge Unlearning for LLMs
  3. 2025RECAP: Reproducing Copyrighted Data from LLMs Training with an Agentic Pipeline
  4. 2026Erase Persona, Forget Lore: Benchmarking Multimodal Copyright Unlearning in Large Vision Language Models
  5. 2025Distribution Preference Optimization: A Fine-grained Perspective for LLM Unlearning
  6. 2023SoK: Memorization in General-Purpose Large Language Models
  7. 2024Simplicity Prevails: Rethinking Negative Preference Optimization for LLM Unlearning
  8. 2025Invariance Makes LLM Unlearning Resilient Even to Unanticipated Downstream Fine-Tuning