Distribution Preference Optimization: A Fine-grained Perspective for LLM Unlearning
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
As Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities learned from vast corpora, concerns regarding data privacy and safety are receiving increasing attention. LLM unlearning, which aims to remove the influence of specific data while preserving overall model utility, is becoming an important research area. One of the mainstream unlearning classes is optimization-based methods, which achieve forgetting directly through fine-tuning, exemplified by Negative Preference Optimization (NPO). However, NPO's effectiveness is limited by its inherent lack of explicit positive preference signals. Attempts to introduce such signals by constructing preferred responses often necessitate domain-specific knowledge or well-designed prompts, fundamentally restricting their generalizability. In this paper, we shift the focus to the distribution-level, directly targeting the next-token probability distribution instead of entire responses, and derive a novel unlearning algorithm termed Distribution Preference Optimization (DiPO). We show that the requisite preference distribution pairs for DiPO, which are distributions over the model's output tokens, can be constructed by selectively amplifying or suppressing the model's high-confidence output logits, thereby effectively overcoming NPO's limitations. We theoretically prove the consistency of DiPO's loss function with the desired unlearning direction. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DiPO achieves a strong trade-off between model utility and forget quality. Notably, DiPO attains the highest forget quality on the TOFU benchmark, and maintains leading scalability and sustainability in utility preservation on the MUSE benchmark.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 45 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2025.
Builds on
45 of 52 references.
Closest ancestors · 9
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Simplicity Prevails: Rethinking Negative Preference Optimization for LLM Unlearning9 Oct
- 2024Alternate Preference Optimization for Unlearning Factual Knowledge in Large Language Models20 Sep
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
- 2024Token-level Direct Preference Optimization18 Apr
- 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning8 Apr
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
- 2023Beyond Reverse KL: Generalizing Direct Preference Optimization with Diverse Divergence Constraints28 Sep
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
Other references · 36
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
- 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 599
- 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 598
- 2023Erasing Concepts from Diffusion Modelscited by 530
- 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMscited by 507
- 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 447
- 2021DExperts: Decoding-Time Controlled Text Generation with Experts and Anti-Expertscited by 434
- 2022Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Modelscited by 424
- 2023SalUn: Empowering Machine Unlearning via Gradient-based Weight Saliency in Both Image Classification and Generationcited by 376
- 2023DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Modelscited by 367
- 2023Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMscited by 366
24 more
- 2022A Survey of Machine Unlearningcited by 298
- 2023Forget-Me-Not: Learning to Forget in Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 297
- 2023Large Language Model Unlearningcited by 288
- 2021Unrolling SGD: Understanding Factors Influencing Machine Unlearningcited by 274
- 2024MUSE: Machine Unlearning Six-Way Evaluation for Language Modelscited by 251
- 2020Approximate Data Deletion from Machine Learning Modelscited by 250
- 2023In-Context Unlearning: Language Models as Few Shot Unlearnerscited by 214
- 2023Unlearn What You Want to Forget: Efficient Unlearning for LLMscited by 211
- 2023Model Sparsity Can Simplify Machine Unlearningcited by 206
- 2022Can Bad Teaching Induce Forgetting? Unlearning in Deep Networks using an Incompetent Teachercited by 189
- 2024Towards Safer Large Language Models through Machine Unlearningcited by 134
- 2022Continual Learning and Private Unlearningcited by 124
- 2024Machine Unlearning of Pre-trained Large Language Modelscited by 118
- 2024SOUL: Unlocking the Power of Second-Order Optimization for LLM Unlearningcited by 104
- 2023KGA: A General Machine Unlearning Framework Based on Knowledge Gap Alignmentcited by 94
- 2023Identifying and Mitigating the Security Risks of Generative AIcited by 90
- 2024Guardrail Baselines for Unlearning in LLMscited by 90
- 2024Reversing the Forget-Retain Objectives: An Efficient LLM Unlearning Framework from Logit Differencecited by 85
- 2023DEPN: Detecting and Editing Privacy Neurons in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 75
- 2024Are we making progress in unlearning? Findings from the first NeurIPS unlearning competitioncited by 48
- 2023Knowledge Sanitization of Large Language Modelscited by 34
- 2024Revisiting Who's Harry Potter: Towards Targeted Unlearning from a Causal Intervention Perspectivecited by 33
- 2024Federated Unlearning with Gradient Descent and Conflict Mitigationcited by 15
- 2024Machine Unlearning for Recommendation Systems: An Insightcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Distinguishable Deletion: Unifying Knowledge Erasure and Refusal for Large Language Model Unlearningcited by 2
- 2026When Retain Constraints Conflict: Mitigating Forget-Retain Interference in Tabular Datacited by 0
- 2026UnlearningSoup: Is Repeated Tuning Necessary for Large Language Model Unlearning?cited by 0
- 2026UnlearningSoup: Is Repeated Tuning Necessary for Large Language Model Unlearning?29 Sep 2026
- 2026When Retain Constraints Conflict: Mitigating Forget-Retain Interference in Tabular Data6 Sep 2026
- 2026Distinguishable Deletion: Unifying Knowledge Erasure and Refusal for Large Language Model Unlearning16 May 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Leveraging Machine Unlearning for Cost-Efficient Preference Alignment
- 2025Invariance Makes LLM Unlearning Resilient Even to Unanticipated Downstream Fine-Tuning
- 2025LLM Unlearning Reveals a Stronger-Than-Expected Coreset Effect in Current Benchmarks
- 2025Leveraging Robust Optimization for LLM Alignment under Distribution Shifts
- 2024UNDIAL: Self-Distillation with Adjusted Logits for Robust Unlearning in Large Language Models
- 2026Explainable LLM Unlearning Through Reasoning
- 2026Maximizing Mutual Information Between Prompt and Response Improves LLM Performance With No Additional Data
- 2024Discovering Preference Optimization Algorithms with and for Large Language Models