mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Local Robustness Quantification for Naive Bayes Classifiers and Generative Forests: a General Approach

arXiv 2609.11366 ↗First posted 10 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We provide methods for calculating the robustness of the predictions of two types of generative classifiers whose underlying distribution is a Probabilistic Graphical Model (PGM): naive Bayes classifiers and generative forests (a probabilistic extension of random forests). Following the paradigm of robustness quantification, we define the robustness of a prediction as the extent to which the distribution of the classifier can be perturbed without changing this prediction. We consider perturbations obtained by varying the local models of the PGMs within general neighborhoods and focus in particular on epsilon-contamination, total variation distance and chi-squared divergence balls. We test our methods on benchmark datasets, demonstrate that the robustness value of a prediction serves as an indicator for its trustworthiness and compare our approach with other such indicators.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2026.

Builds on

6 of 16 references.

References · 6

  1. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
  2. 2019DropConnect Is Effective in Modeling Uncertainty of Bayesian Deep Networkscited by 92
  3. 2020Joints in Random Forestscited by 21
  4. 2020Towards Robust Classification with Deep Generative Forestscited by 5
  5. 2025Robustness quantification: a new method for assessing the reliability of the predictions of a classifiercited by 4
  6. 2026Robustness Quantification and Uncertainty Quantification: Comparing Two Methods for Assessing the Reliability of Classifier Predictionscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.