mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Analytical results for uncertainty propagation through trained machine learning regression models

arXiv 2404.11224 ↗First posted 17 Apr 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) models are increasingly being used in metrology applications. However, for ML models to be credible in a metrology context they should be accompanied by principled uncertainty quantification. This paper addresses the challenge of uncertainty propagation through trained/fixed machine learning (ML) regression models. Analytical expressions for the mean and variance of the model output are obtained/presented for certain input data distributions and for a variety of ML models. Our results cover several popular ML models including linear regression, penalised linear regression, kernel ridge regression, Gaussian Processes (GPs), support vector machines (SVMs) and relevance vector machines (RVMs). We present numerical experiments in which we validate our methods and compare them with a Monte Carlo approach from a computational efficiency point of view. We also illustrate our methods in the context of a metrology application, namely modelling the state-of-health of lithium-ion cells based upon Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) data

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2024.

Builds on

2 of 35 references.

References · 2

  1. 2021Robustness of convolutional neural networks to physiological ECG noisecited by 7
  2. 2021Aleatoric uncertainty for Errors-in-Variables models in deep regressioncited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.