mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dynamics of Algorithmic Content Amplification on TikTok

arXiv 2503.20231 ↗First posted 26 Mar 2025physics.soc-ph cs.AI cs.SIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Intelligent algorithms increasingly shape the content we encounter and engage with online. TikTok's For You feed exemplifies extreme algorithm-driven curation, tailoring the stream of video content almost exclusively based on users' explicit and implicit interactions with the platform. Despite growing attention, the dynamics of content amplification on TikTok remain largely unquantified. How quickly, and to what extent, does TikTok's algorithm amplify content aligned with users' interests? To address these questions, we conduct a sock-puppet audit, deploying bots with different interests to engage with TikTok's "For You" feed. Our findings reveal that content aligned with the bots' interests undergoes strong amplification, with rapid reinforcement typically occurring within the first 200 videos watched. While amplification is consistently observed across all interests, its intensity varies by interest, indicating the emergence of topic-specific biases. Time series analyses and Markov models uncover distinct phases of recommendation dynamics, including persistent content reinforcement and a gradual decline in content diversity over time. Although TikTok's algorithm preserves some content diversity, we find a strong negative correlation between amplification and exploration: as the amplification of interest-aligned content increases, engagement with unseen hashtags declines. These findings contribute to discussions on socio-algorithmic feedback loops in the digital age and the trade-offs between personalization and content diversity.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2025.

Builds on

16 of 46 references.

References · 16

  1. 2023A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 909
  2. 2023Machine Culturecited by 55
  3. 2019Auditing Radicalization Pathways on YouTubecited by 53
  4. 2021Algorithmic Amplification of Politics on Twittercited by 38
  5. 2023Engagement, User Satisfaction, and the Amplification of Divisive Content on Social Mediacited by 30
  6. 2019Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networkscited by 16
  7. 2020Emergence of polarized ideological opinions in multidimensional topic spacescited by 9
  8. 2022An Empirical Investigation of Personalization Factors on TikTokcited by 9
  9. 2023Analyzing User Engagement with TikTok's Short Format Video Recommendations using Data Donationscited by 8
  10. 2024TikTok and the Art of Personalization: Investigating Exploration and Exploitation on Social Media Feedscited by 7
  11. 2023Optimal Engagement-Diversity Tradeoffs in Social Mediacited by 4
  12. 2025Studying Behavioral Addiction by Combining Surveys and Digital Traces: A Case Study of TikTokcited by 4
4 more
  1. 2021Auditing the Biases Enacted by YouTube for Political Topics in Germanycited by 3
  2. 2025YouTube Recommendations Reinforce Negative Emotions: Auditing Algorithmic Bias with Emotionally-Agentic Sock Puppetscited by 2
  3. 2020Interacting discovery processes on complex networkscited by 1
  4. 2023Modeling Rabbit-Holes on YouTubecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.