Rigid-Deformation Decomposition AI Framework for 3D Spatio-Temporal Prediction of Vehicle Collision Dynamics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study presents a rigid-deformation decomposition framework for vehicle collision dynamics that mitigates the spectral bias of implicit neural representations, that is, coordinate-based neural networks that directly map spatio-temporal coordinates to physical fields. We introduce a hierarchical architecture that decouples global rigid-body motion from local deformation using two scale-specific networks, denoted as RigidNet and DeformationNet. To enforce kinematic separation between the two components, we adopt a frozen-anchor training strategy combined with a quaternion-incremental scheme. This strategy alleviates the kinematic instability observed in joint training and yields a 29.8% reduction in rigid-body motion error compared with conventional direct prediction schemes. The stable rigid-body anchor improves the resolution of high-frequency structural buckling, which leads to a 17.2% reduction in the total interpolation error. Loss landscape analysis indicates that the decomposition smooths the optimization surface, which enhances robustness to distribution shifts in angular extrapolation and yields a 46.6% reduction in error. To assess physical validity beyond numerical accuracy, we benchmark the decomposed components against an oracle model that represents an upper bound on performance. The proposed framework recovers 92% of the directional correlation between rigid and deformation components and 96% of the spatial deformation localization accuracy relative to the oracle, while tracking the temporal energy dynamics with an 8 ms delay. These results demonstrate that rigid-deformation decomposition enables accurate and physically interpretable predictions for nonlinear collision dynamics.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2025.
Builds on
16 of 53 references.
References · 16
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,200
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
- 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,360
- 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,352
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
- 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,130
- 2020Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph Networkscited by 880
- 2020Learning Mesh-Based Simulation with Graph Networkscited by 868
- 2021Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnetscited by 540
- 2021Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problemscited by 222
- 2024Efficient Large-Scale Traffic Forecasting with Transformers: A Spatial Data Management Perspectivecited by 26
4 more
- 2024A review of graph neural network applications in mechanics-related domainscited by 14
- 2024A Microstructure-based Graph Neural Network for Accelerating Multiscale Simulationscited by 7
- 2025Data-Efficient Deep Operator Network for Unsteady Flow: A Multi-Fidelity Approach with Physics-Guided Subsamplingcited by 5
- 2024Model-Agnostic AI Framework with Explicit Time Integration for Long-Term Fluid Dynamics Predictioncited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.