mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reliable Radiologic Skeletal Muscle Area Assessment -- A Biomarker for Cancer Cachexia Diagnosis

arXiv 2503.16556 ↗First posted 19 Mar 2025eess.IV cs.AI cs.CEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cancer cachexia is a common metabolic disorder characterized by severe muscle atrophy which is associated with poor prognosis and quality of life. Monitoring skeletal muscle area (SMA) longitudinally through computed tomography (CT) scans, an imaging modality routinely acquired in cancer care, is an effective way to identify and track this condition. However, existing tools often lack full automation and exhibit inconsistent accuracy, limiting their potential for integration into clinical workflows. To address these challenges, we developed SMAART-AI (Skeletal Muscle Assessment-Automated and Reliable Tool-based on AI), an end-to-end automated pipeline powered by deep learning models (nnU-Net 2D) trained on mid-third lumbar level CT images with 5-fold cross-validation, ensuring generalizability and robustness. SMAART-AI incorporates an uncertainty-based mechanism to flag high-error SMA predictions for expert review, enhancing reliability. We combined the SMA, skeletal muscle index, BMI, and clinical data to train a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) model designed to predict cachexia at the time of cancer diagnosis. Tested on the gastroesophageal cancer dataset, SMAART-AI achieved a Dice score of 97.80% +/- 0.93%, with SMA estimated across all four datasets in this study at a median absolute error of 2.48% compared to manual annotations with SliceOmatic. Uncertainty metrics-variance, entropy, and coefficient of variation-strongly correlated with SMA prediction errors (0.83, 0.76, and 0.73 respectively). The MLP model predicts cachexia with 79% precision, providing clinicians with a reliable tool for early diagnosis and intervention. By combining automation, accuracy, and uncertainty awareness, SMAART-AI bridges the gap between research and clinical application, offering a transformative approach to managing cancer cachexia.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2025.

Builds on

13 of 60 references.

References · 13

  1. 2022TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomical structures in CT imagescited by 613
  2. 2020Multivariate Confidence Calibration for Object Detectioncited by 98
  3. 2023A survey on deep learning in medical image registration: new technologies, uncertainty, evaluation metrics, and beyondcited by 55
  4. 2023A review of uncertainty quantification in medical image analysis: probabilistic and non-probabilistic methodscited by 39
  5. 2022Uncertainty-Informed Deep Learning Models Enable High-Confidence Predictions for Digital Histopathologycited by 37
  6. 2022Post-hoc Uncertainty Learning using a Dirichlet Meta-Modelcited by 31
  7. 2023Multimodal Data Integration for Oncology in the Era of Deep Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 20
  8. 2020Fully-automated Body Composition Analysis in Routine CT Imaging Using 3D Semantic Segmentation Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 12
  9. 2024Comparative Benchmarking of Failure Detection Methods in Medical Image Segmentation: Unveiling the Role of Confidence Aggregationcited by 12
  10. 2021Exploring Robust Architectures for Deep Artificial Neural Networkscited by 11
  11. 2023Building Flexible, Scalable, and Machine Learning-ready Multimodal Oncology Datasetscited by 6
  12. 2018Fully-Automated Analysis of Body Composition from CT in Cancer Patients Using Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 3
1 more
  1. 2024Embedding-based Multimodal Learning on Pan-Squamous Cell Carcinomas for Improved Survival Outcomescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.