Human locomotor control timescales depend on the environmental context and sensory input modality
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Everyday locomotion is a complex sensorimotor process that can unfold over multiple timescales, from long-term path planning to rapid, reactive adjustments. However, we lack an understanding of how factors such as environmental demands, or the available sensory information simultaneously influence these control timescales. To address this, we present a unified data-driven framework to quantify the control timescales by identifying how early we can predict future actions from past inputs. We apply this framework across tasks including walking and running, environmental contexts including treadmill, overground, and varied terrains, and sensory input modalities including gaze fixations and body states. We find that deep neural network architectures that effectively handle long-range dependencies, specifically Gated Recurrent Units and Transformers, outperform other architectures and widely used linear models when predicting future actions. Our framework reveals the factors that influence locomotor foot placement control timescales. Across environmental contexts, we discover that humans rely more on fast timescale control in more complex terrain. Across input modalities, we find a hierarchy of control timescales where gaze predicts foot placement before full-body states, which predict before center-of-mass states. Our model also identifies mid-swing as a critical phase when the swing foot's state predicts its future placement, with this timescale adapting across environments. Overall, this work offers data-driven insights into locomotor control in everyday settings, offering models that can be integrated with rehabilitation technologies and movement simulations to improve their applicability in everyday settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2025.
Builds on
17 of 82 references.
References · 17
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
- 2018An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,447
- 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 966
- 2018Deep learning for time series classification: a reviewcited by 575
- 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
- 2016Temporal Convolutional Networks for Action Segmentation and Detectioncited by 504
- 2020GRAB: A Dataset of Whole-Body Human Grasping of Objectscited by 397
- 2019Unsupervised Scalable Representation Learning for Multivariate Time Seriescited by 267
- 2020On Hyperparameter Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms: Theory and Practicecited by 181
- 2016Entity Embeddings of Categorical Variablescited by 85
- 2022MyoSuite -- A contact-rich simulation suite for musculoskeletal motor controlcited by 80
5 more
- 2021Cross-validation: what does it estimate and how well does it do it?cited by 65
- 2024Humanoid Locomotion as Next Token Predictioncited by 63
- 2020MoGaze: A Dataset of Full-Body Motions that Includes Workspace Geometry and Eye-Gazecited by 21
- 2018Interpretable Time Series Classification using All-Subsequence Learning and Symbolic Representations in Time and Frequency Domainscited by 4
- 2022Humans plan for the near future to walk economically on uneven terraincited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.