F`ux`i: A Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models on Ancient Chinese Text Understanding and Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Ancient Chinese text processing presents unique challenges for large language models (LLMs) due to its distinct linguistic features, complex structural constraints, and rich cultural context. While existing benchmarks have primarily focused on evaluating comprehension through multiple-choice questions, there remains a critical gap in assessing models' generative capabilities in classical Chinese. We introduce F`ux`i, a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates both understanding and generation capabilities across 21 diverse tasks. Our benchmark distinguishes itself through three key contributions: (1) balanced coverage of both comprehension and generation tasks, including novel tasks like poetry composition and couplet completion, (2) specialized evaluation metrics designed specifically for classical Chinese text generation, combining rule-based verification with fine-tuned LLM evaluators, and (3) a systematic assessment framework that considers both linguistic accuracy and cultural authenticity. Through extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs, we reveal significant performance gaps between understanding and generation tasks, with models achieving promising results in comprehension but struggling considerably in generation tasks, particularly those requiring deep cultural knowledge and adherence to classical formats. Our findings highlight the current limitations in ancient Chinese text processing and provide insights for future model development. The benchmark, evaluation toolkit, and baseline results are publicly available to facilitate research in this domain.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2025.
Builds on
12 of 34 references.
References · 12
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 694
- 2023CMMLU: Measuring massive multitask language understanding in Chinesecited by 436
- 2023Efficient and Effective Text Encoding for Chinese LLaMA and Alpacacited by 302
- 2024Systematic Evaluation of LLM-as-a-Judge in LLM Alignment Tasks: Explainable Metrics and Diverse Prompt Templatescited by 71
- 2023SuperCLUE: A Comprehensive Chinese Large Language Model Benchmarkcited by 50
- 2023CLEVA: Chinese Language Models EVAluation Platformcited by 13
- 2023Evaluating the Generation Capabilities of Large Chinese Language Modelscited by 11
- 2023WYWEB: A NLP Evaluation Benchmark For Classical Chinesecited by 10
- 2023Can Large Language Model Comprehend Ancient Chinese? A Preliminary Test on ACLUEcited by 10
- 2023Towards Effective Ancient Chinese Translation: Dataset, Model, and Evaluationcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025The Paradox of Poetic Intent in Back-Translation: Evaluating the Quality of Large Language Models in Chinese Translationcited by 2
- 2025MATA: Mindful Assessment of the Telugu Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026SAGE: From Direct Answering to Evidence-Grounded Inference for Chinese Ancient Document Understandingcited by 0
- 2026Neo-Classic: A Benchmark for Evaluating Linguistic-Aesthetic Reasoning in Classical Chinese Poetrycited by 0
- 2026SAGE: From Direct Answering to Evidence-Grounded Inference for Chinese Ancient Document Understanding25 Aug 2026
- 2026Neo-Classic: A Benchmark for Evaluating Linguistic-Aesthetic Reasoning in Classical Chinese Poetry22 Jul 2026
- 2025MATA: Mindful Assessment of the Telugu Abilities of Large Language Models19 Aug 2025
- 2025The Paradox of Poetic Intent in Back-Translation: Evaluating the Quality of Large Language Models in Chinese Translation22 Apr 2025