Task-Specific Data Selection for Instruction Tuning via Monosemantic Neuronal Activations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Instruction tuning improves the ability of large language models (LLMs) to follow diverse human instructions, but achieving strong performance on specific target tasks remains challenging. A critical bottleneck is selecting the most relevant data to maximize task-specific performance. Existing data selection approaches include unstable influence-based methods and more stable distribution alignment methods, the latter of which critically rely on the underlying sample representation. In practice, most distribution alignment methods, from shallow features (e.g., BM25) to neural embeddings (e.g., BGE, LLM2Vec), may fail to capture how the model internally processes samples. To bridge this gap, we adopt a model-centric strategy in which each sample is represented by its neuronal activation pattern in the model, directly reflecting internal computation. However, directly using raw neuron activations leads to spurious similarity between unrelated samples due to neuron polysemanticity, where a single neuron may respond to multiple, unrelated concepts. To address this, we employ sparse autoencoders to disentangle polysemantic activations into sparse, monosemantic representations, and introduce a dedicated similarity metric for this space to better identify task-relevant data. Comprehensive experiments across multiple instruction datasets, models, tasks, and selection ratios show that our approach consistently outperforms existing data selection baselines in both stability and task-specific performance.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2025.
Builds on
43 of 65 references.
References · 43
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
31 more
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,464
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
- 2017Sigmoid-Weighted Linear Units for Neural Network Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 950
- 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 739
- 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 721
- 2023Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 623
- 2024OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Modelscited by 613
- 2019On the Cross-lingual Transferability of Monolingual Representationscited by 578
- 2023C-Pack: Packed Resources For General Chinese Embeddingscited by 578
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
- 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
- 2020TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 488
- 2018Massively Multilingual Sentence Embeddings for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfer and Beyondcited by 434
- 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 408
- 2024LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoderscited by 404
- 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 329
- 2024OLMoE: Open Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelscited by 301
- 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 215
- 2024DsDm: Model-Aware Dataset Selection with Datamodelscited by 105
- 2024MATES: Model-Aware Data Selection for Efficient Pretraining with Data Influence Modelscited by 100
- 2024BM25S: Orders of magnitude faster lexical search via eager sparse scoringcited by 88
- 2024Improving Pretraining Data Using Perplexity Correlationscited by 46
- 2024Your Mixture-of-Experts LLM Is Secretly an Embedding Model For Freecited by 37
- 2024TSDS: Data Selection for Task-Specific Model Finetuningcited by 28
- 2024Rethinking Data Selection at Scale: Random Selection is Almost All You Needcited by 22
- 2025Diversity-driven Data Selection for Language Model Tuning through Sparse Autoencodercited by 12
- 2024MULTI: Multimodal Understanding Leaderboard with Text and Imagescited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026BenchBrowser: Retrieving Evidence for Evaluating Benchmark Validitycited by 1
- 2026From Instance Selection to Fixed-Pool Data Recipe Search for Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 1
- 2026SEED: Targeted Data Selection by Weighted Independent Setcited by 1
- 2026A helps B while B hurts A: directed transfer in instruction-tuning mixturecited by 0
- 2026Support or Magnitude? Characterizing Neuron Relevance for Instruction Data Selectioncited by 0
- 2026Support or Magnitude? Characterizing Neuron Relevance for Instruction Data Selection12 Oct 2026
- 2026A helps B while B hurts A: directed transfer in instruction-tuning mixture30 Sep 2026
- 2026SEED: Targeted Data Selection by Weighted Independent Set15 May 2026
- 2026From Instance Selection to Fixed-Pool Data Recipe Search for Supervised Fine-Tuning13 May 2026
- 2026BenchBrowser: Retrieving Evidence for Evaluating Benchmark Validity25 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders for Monosemantic Representation
- 2026Neuron-Aware Data Selection In Instruction Tuning For Large Language Models
- 2025Unveiling Instruction-Specific Neurons & Experts: An Analytical Framework for LLM's Instruction-Following Capabilities
- 2024ROSE: A Reward-Oriented Data Selection Framework for LLM Task-Specific Instruction Tuning
- 2025Aligning Instruction Tuning with Pre-training
- 2023Self-Evolved Diverse Data Sampling for Efficient Instruction Tuning
- 2024Encourage or Inhibit Monosemanticity? Revisit Monosemanticity from a Feature Decorrelation Perspective
- 2025WINA: Weight Informed Neuron Activation for Accelerating Large Language Model Inference