mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Unified Framework for Real-Time Failure Handling in Robotics Using Vision-Language Models, Reactive Planner and Behavior Trees

arXiv 2503.15202 ↗First posted 19 Mar 2025cs.RO cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Robotic systems often face execution failures due to unexpected obstacles, sensor errors, or environmental changes. Traditional failure recovery methods rely on predefined strategies or human intervention, making them less adaptable. This paper presents a unified failure recovery framework that combines Vision-Language Models (VLMs), a reactive planner, and Behavior Trees (BTs) to enable real-time failure handling. Our approach includes pre-execution verification, which checks for potential failures before execution, and reactive failure handling, which detects and corrects failures during execution by verifying existing BT conditions, adding missing preconditions and, when necessary, generating new skills. The framework uses a scene graph for structured environmental perception and an execution history for continuous monitoring, enabling context-aware and adaptive failure handling. We evaluate our framework through real-world experiments with an ABB YuMi robot on tasks like peg insertion, object sorting, and drawer placement, as well as in AI2-THOR simulator. Compared to using pre-execution and reactive methods separately, our approach achieves higher task success rates and greater adaptability. Ablation studies highlight the importance of VLM-based reasoning, structured scene representation, and execution history tracking for effective failure recovery in robotics.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2025.

Builds on

26 of 33 references.

References · 26

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  2. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
  3. 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,863
  4. 2017AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AIcited by 869
  5. 2023REFLECT: Summarizing Robot Experiences for Failure Explanation and Correctioncited by 175
  6. 2024AHA: A Vision-Language-Model for Detecting and Reasoning Over Failures in Robotic Manipulationcited by 125
  7. 2017Behavior Trees in Robotics and AI: An Introductioncited by 107
  8. 2024Large Language Models for Robotics: Opportunities, Challenges, and Perspectivescited by 89
  9. 2024Code-as-Monitor: Constraint-aware Visual Programming for Reactive and Proactive Robotic Failure Detectioncited by 63
  10. 2023DoReMi: Grounding Language Model by Detecting and Recovering from Plan-Execution Misalignmentcited by 61
  11. 2020A Survey of Behavior Trees in Robotics and AIcited by 55
  12. 2024RACER: Rich Language-Guided Failure Recovery Policies for Imitation Learningcited by 49
14 more
  1. 2016Towards Blended Reactive Planning and Acting using Behavior Treescited by 21
  2. 2024Recover: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Failure Detection and Recoverycited by 15
  3. 2024Integrating Intent Understanding and Optimal Behavior Planning for Behavior Tree Generation from Human Instructionscited by 12
  4. 2024CIMRL: Combining IMitation and Reinforcement Learning for Safe Autonomous Drivingcited by 12
  5. 2020On modularity in reactive control architectures, with an application to formal verificationcited by 11
  6. 2024Automatic Behavior Tree Expansion with LLMs for Robotic Manipulationcited by 10
  7. 2024Neuro-Symbolic AI: Explainability, Challenges, and Future Trendscited by 10
  8. 2023BeBOP -- Combining Reactive Planning and Bayesian Optimization to Solve Robotic Manipulation Taskscited by 6
  9. 2025Unlocking the Potential of Generative AI through Neuro-Symbolic Architectures: Benefits and Limitationscited by 6
  10. 2020Secure Recovery Procedure for Manufacturing Systems using Synchronizing Automata and Supervisory Control Theorycited by 2
  11. 2024Addressing Failures in Robotics using Vision-Based Language Models (VLMs) and Behavior Trees (BT)cited by 2
  12. 2023Adaptive Compliant Robot Control with Failure Recovery for Object Press-Fittingcited by 1
  13. 2023Motion Priority Optimization Framework towards Automated and Teleoperated Robot Cooperation in Industrial Recovery Scenarioscited by 1
  14. 2024Adaptable Recovery Behaviors in Robotics: A Behavior Trees and Motion Generators(BTMG) Approach for Failure Managementcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Automating Robot Failure Recovery Using Vision-Language Models With Optimized Prompts
  2. 2025FailSafe: Reasoning and Recovery from Failures in Vision-Language-Action Models
  3. 2026Failing Forward: Adaptive Failure-Informed Learning for Vision-Language-Action Models
  4. 2025FPC-VLA: A Vision-Language-Action Framework with a Supervisor for Failure Prediction and Correction
  5. 2025RoboFAC: A Comprehensive Framework for Robotic Failure Analysis and Correction
  6. 2026FailBench: How Reliable are VLMs at Judging Robot Task Success?
  7. 2026FLARE: A Failure-Aware Framework for Autonomous Correction and Recovery in Visual-Language Robotic Manipulation
  8. 2026CARE: Experience-Guided Atomic Corrective Execution for Vision-Language-Action Policies