mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Recover: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Failure Detection and Recovery

arXiv 2404.00756 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2024cs.AI cs.LG cs.LOcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recognizing failures during task execution and implementing recovery procedures is challenging in robotics. Traditional approaches rely on the availability of extensive data or a tight set of constraints, while more recent approaches leverage large language models (LLMs) to verify task steps and replan accordingly. However, these methods often operate offline, necessitating scene resets and incurring in high costs. This paper introduces Recover, a neuro-symbolic framework for online failure identification and recovery. By integrating ontologies, logical rules, and LLM-based planners, Recover exploits symbolic information to enhance the ability of LLMs to generate recovery plans and also to decrease the associated costs. In order to demonstrate the capabilities of our method in a simulated kitchen environment, we introduce OntoThor, an ontology describing the AI2Thor simulator setting. Empirical evaluation shows that OntoThor's logical rules accurately detect all failures in the analyzed tasks, and that Recover considerably outperforms, for both failure detection and recovery, a baseline method reliant solely on LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2024.

Builds on

25 of 31 references.

References · 25

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  4. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  5. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  6. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
  7. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
  8. 2022Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agentscited by 1,029
  9. 2017AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AIcited by 850
  10. 2023ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learnerscited by 814
  11. 2023Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmapcited by 663
  12. 2021AudioCLIP: Extending CLIP to Image, Text and Audiocited by 335
13 more
  1. 2023Robots That Ask For Help: Uncertainty Alignment for Large Language Model Plannerscited by 298
  2. 2023ChatGPT for Robotics: Design Principles and Model Abilitiescited by 296
  3. 2023TidyBot: Personalized Robot Assistance with Large Language Modelscited by 219
  4. 2022ROSCOE: A Suite of Metrics for Scoring Step-by-Step Reasoningcited by 175
  5. 2023REFLECT: Summarizing Robot Experiences for Failure Explanation and Correctioncited by 171
  6. 2023Retroformer: Retrospective Large Language Agents with Policy Gradient Optimizationcited by 110
  7. 2020Keep CALM and Explore: Language Models for Action Generation in Text-based Gamescited by 108
  8. 2023RobotGPT: Robot Manipulation Learning from ChatGPTcited by 39
  9. 2018A survey on policy search algorithms for learning robot controllers in a handful of trialscited by 33
  10. 2020Graph Density-Aware Losses for Novel Compositions in Scene Graph Generationcited by 31
  11. 2021Semantic-Based Explainable AI: Leveraging Semantic Scene Graphs and Pairwise Ranking to Explain Robot Failurescited by 12
  12. 2023Learning from Mistakes via Cooperative Study Assistant for Large Language Modelscited by 9
  13. 2023Semantically Aligned Task Decomposition in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 6; 2026: 6.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: