mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PA-CFL: Privacy-Adaptive Clustered Federated Learning for Transformer-Based Sales Forecasting on Heterogeneous Retail Data

arXiv 2503.12220 ↗First posted 15 Mar 2025cs.LG cs.CRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning (FL) enables retailers to share model parameters for demand forecasting while maintaining privacy. However, heterogeneous data across diverse regions, driven by factors such as varying consumer behavior, poses challenges to the effectiveness of federated learning. To tackle this challenge, we propose Privacy-Adaptive Clustered Federated Learning (PA-CFL) tailored for demand forecasting on heterogeneous retail data. By leveraging differential privacy and feature importance distribution, PA-CFL groups retailers into distinct ``bubbles'', each forming its own federated learning system to effectively isolate data heterogeneity. Within each bubble, Transformer models are designed to predict local sales for each client. Our experiments demonstrate that PA-CFL significantly surpasses FedAvg and outperforms local learning in demand forecasting performance across all participating clients. Compared to local learning, PA-CFL achieves a 5.4% improvement in R^2, a 69% reduction in RMSE, and a 45% decrease in MAE. Our approach enables effective FL through adaptive adjustments to diverse noise levels and the range of clients participating in each bubble. By grouping participants and proactively filtering out high-risk clients, PA-CFL mitigates potential threats to the FL system. The findings demonstrate PA-CFL's ability to enhance federated learning in time series prediction tasks with heterogeneous data, achieving a balance between forecasting accuracy and privacy preservation in retail applications. Additionally, PA-CFL's capability to detect and neutralize poisoned data from clients enhances the system's robustness and reliability.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2025.

Builds on

19 of 78 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
  3. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,475
  4. 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,229
  5. 2021Transformer in Transformercited by 633
  6. 2019Clustered Federated Learning: Model-Agnostic Distributed Multi-Task Optimization under Privacy Constraintscited by 503
  7. 2022Transformers in Time Series: A Surveycited by 497
  8. 2018Communication-Efficient On-Device Machine Learning: Federated Distillation and Augmentation under Non-IID Private Datacited by 243
  9. 2020Federated learning with hierarchical clustering of local updates to improve training on non-IID datacited by 223
  10. 2018Applied Federated Learning: Improving Google Keyboard Query Suggestionscited by 204
  11. 2023Heterogeneous Federated Learning: State-of-the-art and Research Challengescited by 161
  12. 2020Survey of Personalization Techniques for Federated Learningcited by 145
7 more
  1. 2020Salvaging Federated Learning by Local Adaptationcited by 142
  2. 2021Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspectivecited by 93
  3. 2022Transformers in Time-series Analysis: A Tutorialcited by 46
  4. 2022Rethinking Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning: Introducing a New Notion and Standard Benchmarkscited by 24
  5. 2019Sales Demand Forecast in E-commerce using a Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network Methodologycited by 18
  6. 2023Enhancing Supply Chain Resilience: A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Product Availability Dates Under Disruptioncited by 3
  7. 2020Customer Data Sharing Platform: A Blockchain-Based Shopping Cartcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.