Review of Machine Learning for Micro-Electronic Design Verification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Microelectronic design verification remains a critical bottleneck in device development, traditionally mitigated by expanding verification teams and computational resources. Since the late 1990s, machine learning (ML) has been proposed to enhance verification efficiency, yet many techniques have not achieved mainstream adoption. This review, from the perspective of verification and ML practitioners, examines the application of ML in dynamic-based techniques for functional verification of microelectronic designs, and provides a starting point for those new to this interdisciplinary field. Historical trends, techniques, ML types, and evaluation baselines are analysed to understand why previous research has not been widely adopted in industry. The review highlights the application of ML, the techniques used and critically discusses their limitations and successes. Although there is a wealth of promising research, real-world adoption is hindered by challenges in comparing techniques, identifying suitable applications, and the expertise required for implementation. This review proposes that the field can progress through the creation and use of open datasets, common benchmarks, and verification targets. By establishing open evaluation criteria, industry can guide future research. Parallels with ML in software verification suggest potential for collaboration. Additionally, greater use of open-source designs and verification environments can allow more researchers from outside the hardware verification discipline to contribute to the challenge of verifying microelectronic designs.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 111 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2025.
Builds on
12 of 111 references.
References · 12
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,736
- 2021Machine Learning for Electronic Design Automation: A Surveycited by 72
- 2024AutoBench: Automatic Testbench Generation and Evaluation Using LLMs for HDL Designcited by 41
- 2022Using Neural Networks for Novelty-based Test Selection to Accelerate Functional Coverage Closurecited by 5
- 2024Efficient Stimuli Generation using Reinforcement Learning in Design Verificationcited by 5
- 2022Supervised Learning for Coverage-Directed Test Selection in Simulation-Based Verificationcited by 4
- 2020Design Rule Checking with a CNN Based Feature Extractorcited by 3
- 2021VeRLPy: Python Library for Verification of Digital Designs with Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
- 2024VeriBug: An Attention-based Framework for Bug-Localization in Hardware Designscited by 3
- 2022Hybrid Intelligent Testing in Simulation-Based Verificationcited by 2
- 2024Detecting Stimuli with Novel Temporal Patterns to Accelerate Functional Coverage Closurecited by 2
- 2022The Integration of Machine Learning into Automated Test Generation: A Systematic Mapping Studycited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.