mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Perplexity Trap: PLM-Based Retrievers Overrate Low Perplexity Documents

arXiv 2503.08684 ↗First posted 11 Mar 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.IRcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Previous studies have found that PLM-based retrieval models exhibit a preference for LLM-generated content, assigning higher relevance scores to these documents even when their semantic quality is comparable to human-written ones. This phenomenon, known as source bias, threatens the sustainable development of the information access ecosystem. However, the underlying causes of source bias remain unexplored. In this paper, we explain the process of information retrieval with a causal graph and discover that PLM-based retrievers learn perplexity features for relevance estimation, causing source bias by ranking the documents with low perplexity higher. Theoretical analysis further reveals that the phenomenon stems from the positive correlation between the gradients of the loss functions in language modeling task and retrieval task. Based on the analysis, a causal-inspired inference-time debiasing method is proposed, called Causal Diagnosis and Correction (CDC). CDC first diagnoses the bias effect of the perplexity and then separates the bias effect from the overall estimated relevance score. Experimental results across three domains demonstrate the superior debiasing effectiveness of CDC, emphasizing the validity of our proposed explanatory framework. Source codes are available at https://github.com/WhyDwelledOnAi/Perplexity-Trap.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2025.

Builds on

31 of 45 references.

References · 31

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  5. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  6. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  7. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
  8. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  9. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
  10. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
  11. 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,203
  12. 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 846
19 more
  1. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  2. 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 623
  3. 2020SPECTER: Document-level Representation Learning using Citation-informed Transformerscited by 426
  4. 2023The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forgetcited by 343
  5. 2020Overview of the TREC 2019 deep learning trackcited by 282
  6. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 278
  7. 2021Efficiently Teaching an Effective Dense Retriever with Balanced Topic Aware Samplingcited by 238
  8. 2023A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPTcited by 221
  9. 2021Unsupervised Corpus Aware Language Model Pre-training for Dense Passage Retrievalcited by 203
  10. 2024Large Language Models are Inconsistent and Biased Evaluatorscited by 146
  11. 2022Dense Text Retrieval based on Pretrained Language Models: A Surveycited by 136
  12. 2024Bias and Unfairness in Information Retrieval Systems: New Challenges in the LLM Eracited by 97
  13. 2022Debiasing Graph Neural Networks via Learning Disentangled Causal Substructurecited by 83
  14. 2021Semantic Models for the First-stage Retrieval: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 57
  15. 2023Neural Retrievers are Biased Towards LLM-Generated Contentcited by 37
  16. 2019Learning Surrogate Lossescited by 21
  17. 2024Cocktail: A Comprehensive Information Retrieval Benchmark with LLM-Generated Documents Integrationcited by 17
  18. 2024Likelihood-based Mitigation of Evaluation Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 9
  19. 2024Exploring the Escalation of Source Bias in User, Data, and Recommender System Feedback Loopcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.