mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Task and Motion Planning Framework Using Iteratively Deepened AND/OR Graph Networks

arXiv 2503.07700 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2025cs.RO cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we present an approach for integrated task and motion planning based on an AND/OR graph network, which is used to represent task-level states and actions, and we leverage it to implement different classes of task and motion planning problems (TAMP). Several problems that fall under task and motion planning do not have a predetermined number of sub-tasks to achieve a goal. For example, while retrieving a target object from a cluttered workspace, in principle the number of object re-arrangements required to finally grasp it cannot be known ahead of time. To address this challenge, and in contrast to traditional planners, also those based on AND/OR graphs, we grow the AND/OR graph at run-time by progressively adding sub-graphs until grasping the target object becomes feasible, which yields a network of AND/OR graphs. The approach is extended to enable multi-robot task and motion planning, and (i) it allows us to perform task allocation while coordinating the activity of a given number of robots, and (ii) can handle multi-robot tasks involving an a priori unknown number of sub-tasks. The approach is evaluated and validated both in simulation and with a real dual-arm robot manipulator, that is, Baxter from Rethink Robotics. In particular, for the single-robot task and motion planning, we validated our approach in three different TAMP domains. Furthermore, we also use three different robots for simulation, namely, Baxter, Franka Emika Panda manipulators, and a PR2 robot. Experiments show that our approach can be readily scaled to scenarios with many objects and robots, and is capable of handling different classes of TAMP problems.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2025.

Builds on

16 of 50 references.

References · 16

  1. 2020Integrated Task and Motion Planningcited by 290
  2. 2018PDDLStream: Integrating Symbolic Planners and Blackbox Samplers via Optimistic Adaptive Planningcited by 150
  3. 2016FFRob: Leveraging Symbolic Planning for Efficient Task and Motion Planningcited by 34
  4. 2020A Hierarchical Architecture for Human-Robot Cooperation Processescited by 12
  5. 2019An Optimal Algorithm to Solve the Combined Task Allocation and Path Finding Problemcited by 9
  6. 2020Towards Multi-Robot Task-Motion Planning for Navigation in Belief Spacecited by 9
  7. 2018On the manipulation of articulated objects in human-robot cooperation scenarioscited by 7
  8. 2020Manipulation of Articulated Objects using Dual-arm Robots via Answer Set Programmingcited by 7
  9. 2021MPTP: Motion-Planning-aware Task Planning for Navigation in Belief Spacecited by 7
  10. 2021Task Allocation for Multi-Robot Task and Motion Planning: a case for Object Picking in Cluttered Workspacescited by 7
  11. 2017Flexible human-robot cooperation models for assisted shop-floor taskscited by 5
  12. 2022Long-Horizon Planning and Execution with Functional Object-Oriented Networkscited by 5
4 more
  1. 2023Computational Tradeoff in Minimum Obstacle Displacement Planning for Robot Navigationcited by 5
  2. 2022Minimum Displacement Motion Planning for Movable Obstaclescited by 4
  3. 2022Gesture-based Human-Machine Interaction: Taxonomy, Problem Definition, and Analysiscited by 3
  4. 2023Revisiting the Minimum Constraint Removal Problem in Mobile Roboticscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.