MPTP: Motion-Planning-aware Task Planning for Navigation in Belief Space
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present an integrated Task-Motion Planning (TMP) framework for navigation in large-scale environments. Of late, TMP for manipulation has attracted significant interest resulting in a proliferation of different approaches. In contrast, TMP for navigation has received considerably less attention. Autonomous robots operating in real-world complex scenarios require planning in the discrete (task) space and the continuous (motion) space. In knowledge-intensive domains, on the one hand, a robot has to reason at the highest-level, for example, the objects to procure, the regions to navigate to in order to acquire them; on the other hand, the feasibility of the respective navigation tasks have to be checked at the execution level. This presents a need for motion-planning-aware task planners. In this paper, we discuss a probabilistically complete approach that leverages this task-motion interaction for navigating in large knowledge-intensive domains, returning a plan that is optimal at the task-level. The framework is intended for motion planning under motion and sensing uncertainty, which is formally known as belief space planning. The underlying methodology is validated in simulation, in an office environment and its scalability is tested in the larger Willow Garage world. A reasonable comparison with a work that is closest to our approach is also provided. We also demonstrate the adaptability of our approach by considering a building floor navigation domain. Finally, we also discuss the limitations of our approach and put forward suggestions for improvements and future work.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2021.
Builds on
5 of 61 references.
References · 5
- 2019Online Replanning in Belief Space for Partially Observable Task and Motion Problemscited by 61
- 2018Task Planning in Robotics: an Empirical Comparison of PDDL-based and ASP-based Systemscited by 40
- 2016FFRob: Leveraging Symbolic Planning for Efficient Task and Motion Planningcited by 34
- 2020Towards Multi-Robot Task-Motion Planning for Navigation in Belief Spacecited by 9
- 2013Towards Combining HTN Planning and Geometric Task Planningcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2023Computational Tradeoff in Minimum Obstacle Displacement Planning for Robot Navigationcited by 5
- 2022Minimum Displacement Motion Planning for Movable Obstaclescited by 4
- 2025A Task and Motion Planning Framework Using Iteratively Deepened AND/OR Graph Networkscited by 2
- 2025Locally Optimal Solutions to Constraint Displacement Problems via Path-Obstacle Overlapscited by 1
- 2025A Framework for Task and Motion Planning based on Expanding AND/OR Graphscited by 0
- 2026Learning Motion Feasibility from Point Clouds in Cluttered Environmentscited by 0
- 2026A Horizon-slicing Approach to Minimum Obstacle Displacement Planning for Robot Navigationcited by 0
- 2026A Horizon-slicing Approach to Minimum Obstacle Displacement Planning for Robot Navigation19 Sep 2026
- 2026Learning Motion Feasibility from Point Clouds in Cluttered Environments25 Jun 2026
- 2025Locally Optimal Solutions to Constraint Displacement Problems via Path-Obstacle Overlaps15 Nov 2025
- 2025A Framework for Task and Motion Planning based on Expanding AND/OR Graphs30 Aug 2025
- 2025A Task and Motion Planning Framework Using Iteratively Deepened AND/OR Graph Networks10 Mar 2025
- 2023Computational Tradeoff in Minimum Obstacle Displacement Planning for Robot Navigation14 Feb 2023
- 2022Minimum Displacement Motion Planning for Movable Obstacles27 Apr 2022