Sample-Efficient Optimization over Generative Priors via Coarse Learnability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study zeroth-order optimization where solutions must minimize a cost d(s) while maintaining high probability under a complex generative prior L(s) (e.g., a parameterized model). This reduces to sampling from a target distribution proportional to L(s) e-T · d(s). Since classical model-based optimization (MBO) lacks finite-sample guarantees for expressive approximate learners, we introduce "coarse learnability", a flexible statistical assumption requiring only that a learned model covers the target's probability mass within a polynomial factor. Leveraging this assumption, we design an iterative MBO algorithm called alift with a sample correction step that provably approximates the target using only a polynomial number of samples. We apply this framework to globally optimizing non-convex objectives bounded by a quadratic envelope in Rn, where we show this assumption is naturally satisfied for a family of "optimistic" posterior distributions. To reach global varepsilon-optimality, this implies a sample complexity of widetildeO(log 1/varepsilon), a rate characteristic of optimistic space-partitioning methods. We further justify coarse learnability as an assumption for generative priors theoretically, proving that in simple settings, parametric maximum likelihood estimation and over-smoothed kernel density estimators naturally satisfy it. Finally, one motivation for our framework comes from inference-time alignment. Though our primary contribution pertains to the theoretical foundations of MBO, we provide qualitative evidence that, in simple settings, even primitive LLMs can shift their distributions toward lower-cost regions when fine-tuned with zeroth-order feedback.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2025.
Builds on
32 of 87 references.
References · 32
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
- 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,352
- 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 864
- 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 625
- 2019Are Transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions?cited by 406
- 2016Entropy-SGD: Biasing Gradient Descent Into Wide Valleyscited by 359
20 more
- 2023Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 349
- 2016Data-Efficient Off-Policy Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 286
- 2024ReEvo: Large Language Models as Hyper-Heuristics with Reflective Evolutioncited by 276
- 2024Evolution of Heuristics: Towards Efficient Automatic Algorithm Design Using Large Language Modelcited by 268
- 2013Learning to Optimize Via Posterior Samplingcited by 256
- 2023Can Language Models Solve Graph Problems in Natural Language?cited by 252
- 2017Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning: A Survey and Interpretationcited by 196
- 2019On the Theory of Policy Gradient Methods: Optimality, Approximation, and Distribution Shiftcited by 177
- 2019Neural-Symbolic Computing: An Effective Methodology for Principled Integration of Machine Learning and Reasoningcited by 151
- 2023Self-Taught Optimizer (STOP): Recursively Self-Improving Code Generationcited by 148
- 2024Exploratory Preference Optimization: Harnessing Implicit Q*-Approximation for Sample-Efficient RLHFcited by 106
- 2024Self-Improvement in Language Models: The Sharpening Mechanismcited by 104
- 2022The Role of Coverage in Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 83
- 2024Transformers, parallel computation, and logarithmic depthcited by 79
- 2019NeuTra-lizing Bad Geometry in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Using Neural Transportcited by 74
- 2024Understanding Transformer Reasoning Capabilities via Graph Algorithmscited by 67
- 2025Evolving Deeper LLM Thinkingcited by 58
- 2025SETS: Leveraging Self-Verification and Self-Correction for Improved Test-Time Scalingcited by 54
- 2015Listen, Attend, and Walk: Neural Mapping of Navigational Instructions to Action Sequencescited by 50
- 2024Investigating the Potential of Using Large Language Models for Schedulingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.