STAR: A Foundation Model-driven Framework for Robust Task Planning and Failure Recovery in Robotic Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern robotic systems, deployed across domains from industrial automation to domestic assistance, face a critical challenge: executing tasks with precision and adaptability in dynamic, unpredictable environments. To address this, we propose STAR (Smart Task Adaptation and Recovery), a novel framework that synergizes Foundation Models (FMs) with dynamically expanding Knowledge Graphs (KGs) to enable resilient task planning and autonomous failure recovery. While FMs offer remarkable generalization and contextual reasoning, their limitations, including computational inefficiency, hallucinations, and output inconsistencies hinder reliable deployment. STAR mitigates these issues by embedding learned knowledge into structured, reusable KGs, which streamline information retrieval, reduce redundant FM computations, and provide precise, scenario-specific insights. The framework leverages FM-driven reasoning to diagnose failures, generate context-aware recovery strategies, and execute corrective actions without human intervention or system restarts. Unlike conventional approaches that rely on rigid protocols, STAR dynamically expands its KG with experiential knowledge, ensuring continuous adaptation to novel scenarios. To evaluate the effectiveness of this approach, we developed a comprehensive dataset that includes various robotic tasks and failure scenarios. Through extensive experimentation, STAR demonstrated an 86% task planning accuracy and 78% recovery success rate, showing significant improvements over baseline methods. The framework's ability to continuously learn from experience while maintaining structured knowledge representation makes it particularly suitable for long-term deployment in real-world applications.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2025.
Builds on
37 of 56 references.
References · 37
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
- 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,071
- 2021Grounded Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 1,156
- 2022Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agentscited by 1,035
- 2022ProgPrompt: Generating Situated Robot Task Plans using Large Language Modelscited by 611
- 2023LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiencycited by 501
25 more
- 2022LLM-Planner: Few-Shot Grounded Planning for Embodied Agents with Large Language Modelscited by 462
- 2022LM-Nav: Robotic Navigation with Large Pre-Trained Models of Language, Vision, and Actioncited by 439
- 2024ReKep: Spatio-Temporal Reasoning of Relational Keypoint Constraints for Robotic Manipulationcited by 315
- 2023Text2Motion: From Natural Language Instructions to Feasible Planscited by 224
- 2023REFLECT: Summarizing Robot Experiences for Failure Explanation and Correctioncited by 175
- 2023AutoTAMP: Autoregressive Task and Motion Planning with LLMs as Translators and Checkerscited by 113
- 2023CLIP2: Contrastive Language-Image-Point Pretraining from Real-World Point Cloud Datacited by 69
- 2023Tree-Planner: Efficient Close-loop Task Planning with Large Language Modelscited by 48
- 2023CrowdCLIP: Unsupervised Crowd Counting via Vision-Language Modelcited by 47
- 2023FLIP: Cross-domain Face Anti-spoofing with Language Guidancecited by 45
- 2024RePLan: Robotic Replanning with Perception and Language Modelscited by 41
- 2021Explainable AI for Robot Failures: Generating Explanations that Improve User Assistance in Fault Recoverycited by 32
- 2022CAPE: Corrective Actions from Precondition Errors using Large Language Modelscited by 30
- 2023Vision-Language Interpreter for Robot Task Planningcited by 30
- 2019Functional Object-Oriented Network for Manipulation Learningcited by 27
- 2023Interactive Planning Using Large Language Models for Partially Observable Robotics Taskscited by 27
- 2018A Survey of Knowledge Representation in Service Roboticscited by 18
- 2021GraphPlan: Story Generation by Planning with Event Graphcited by 18
- 2020FINO-Net: A Deep Multimodal Sensor Fusion Framework for Manipulation Failure Detectioncited by 13
- 2021Semantic-Based Explainable AI: Leveraging Semantic Scene Graphs and Pairwise Ranking to Explain Robot Failurescited by 13
- 2022Why did I fail? A Causal-based Method to Find Explanations for Robot Failurescited by 13
- 2022Approximate Task Tree Retrieval in a Knowledge Network for Robotic Cookingcited by 13
- 2023Leveraging VLM-Based Pipelines to Annotate 3D Objectscited by 10
- 2023ERRA: An Embodied Representation and Reasoning Architecture for Long-horizon Language-conditioned Manipulation Taskscited by 8
- 2024Consolidating Trees of Robotic Plans Generated Using Large Language Models to Improve Reliabilitycited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.