mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

VirtualXAI: A User-Centric Framework for Explainability Assessment Leveraging GPT-Generated Personas

arXiv 2503.04261 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2025cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In today's data-driven era, computational systems generate vast amounts of data that drive the digital transformation of industries, where Artificial Intelligence (AI) plays a key role. Currently, the demand for eXplainable AI (XAI) has increased to enhance the interpretability, transparency, and trustworthiness of AI models. However, evaluating XAI methods remains challenging: existing evaluation frameworks typically focus on quantitative properties such as fidelity, consistency, and stability without taking into account qualitative characteristics such as satisfaction and interpretability. In addition, practitioners face a lack of guidance in selecting appropriate datasets, AI models, and XAI methods -a major hurdle in human-AI collaboration. To address these gaps, we propose a framework that integrates quantitative benchmarking with qualitative user assessments through virtual personas based on the "Anthology" of backstories of the Large Language Model (LLM). Our framework also incorporates a content-based recommender system that leverages dataset-specific characteristics to match new input data with a repository of benchmarked datasets. This yields an estimated XAI score and provides tailored recommendations for both the optimal AI model and the XAI method for a given scenario.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2025.

Builds on

17 of 44 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  4. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  5. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  6. 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
  7. 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 299
  8. 2018Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretabilitycited by 256
  9. 2019InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretabilitycited by 243
  10. 2017Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Understanding, Visualizing and Interpreting Deep Learning Modelscited by 202
  11. 2020Evaluating Explanations: How much do explanations from the teacher aid students?cited by 94
  12. 2018How do Humans Understand Explanations from Machine Learning Systems? An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanationcited by 71
5 more
  1. 2019An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanationcited by 71
  2. 2024Virtual Personas for Language Models via an Anthology of Backstoriescited by 49
  3. 2023Transforming Sentiment Analysis in the Financial Domain with ChatGPTcited by 25
  4. 2024XAI for All: Can Large Language Models Simplify Explainable AI?cited by 21
  5. 2025MarketSenseAI 2.0: Enhancing Stock Analysis through LLM Agentscited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.