mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Q-PART: Quasi-Periodic Adaptive Regression with Test-time Training for Pediatric Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Regression

arXiv 2503.04131 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we address the challenge of adaptive pediatric Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) assessment. While Test-time Training (TTT) approaches show promise for this task, they suffer from two significant limitations. Existing TTT works are primarily designed for classification tasks rather than continuous value regression, and they lack mechanisms to handle the quasi-periodic nature of cardiac signals. To tackle these issues, we propose a novel Quasi-Periodic Adaptive Regression with Test-time Training (Q-PART) framework. In the training stage, the proposed Quasi-Period Network decomposes the echocardiogram into periodic and aperiodic components within latent space by combining parameterized helix trajectories with Neural Controlled Differential Equations. During inference, our framework further employs a variance minimization strategy across image augmentations that simulate common quality issues in echocardiogram acquisition, along with differential adaptation rates for periodic and aperiodic components. Theoretical analysis is provided to demonstrate that our variance minimization objective effectively bounds the regression error under mild conditions. Furthermore, extensive experiments across three pediatric age groups demonstrate that Q-PART not only significantly outperforms existing approaches in pediatric LVEF prediction, but also exhibits strong clinical screening capability with high mAUROC scores (up to 0.9747) and maintains gender-fair performance across all metrics, validating its robustness and practical utility in pediatric echocardiography analysis.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2025.

Builds on

18 of 41 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017A Closer Look at Spatiotemporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 1,143
  2. 2020Neural Controlled Differential Equations for Irregular Time Seriescited by 506
  3. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
  4. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 431
  5. 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 377
  6. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 359
  7. 2023CLIP-Driven Universal Model for Organ Segmentation and Tumor Detectioncited by 224
  8. 2022Test-Time Training with Masked Autoencoderscited by 212
  9. 2023DELTA: degradation-free fully test-time adaptationcited by 72
  10. 2023RDumb: A simple approach that questions our progress in continual test-time adaptationcited by 53
  11. 2021Domain Generalization via Inference-time Label-Preserving Target Projectionscited by 35
  12. 2022TTTFlow: Unsupervised Test-Time Training with Normalizing Flowcited by 33
6 more
  1. 2023ClusT3: Information Invariant Test-Time Trainingcited by 21
  2. 2022Online Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation in Ever-Changing Conditionscited by 16
  3. 2022EchoCoTr: Estimation of the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction from Spatiotemporal Echocardiographycited by 16
  4. 2022Cyclical Self-Supervision for Semi-Supervised Ejection Fraction Prediction from Echocardiogram Videoscited by 12
  5. 2024CoReEcho: Continuous Representation Learning for 2D+time Echocardiography Analysiscited by 8
  6. 2023REALM: Robust Entropy Adaptive Loss Minimization for Improved Single-Sample Test-Time Adaptationcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.