mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

REALM: Robust Entropy Adaptive Loss Minimization for Improved Single-Sample Test-Time Adaptation

arXiv 2309.03964 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2023cs.LG cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fully-test-time adaptation (F-TTA) can mitigate performance loss due to distribution shifts between train and test data (1) without access to the training data, and (2) without knowledge of the model training procedure. In online F-TTA, a pre-trained model is adapted using a stream of test samples by minimizing a self-supervised objective, such as entropy minimization. However, models adapted with online using entropy minimization, are unstable especially in single sample settings, leading to degenerate solutions, and limiting the adoption of TTA inference strategies. Prior works identify noisy, or unreliable, samples as a cause of failure in online F-TTA. One solution is to ignore these samples, which can lead to bias in the update procedure, slow adaptation, and poor generalization. In this work, we present a general framework for improving robustness of F-TTA to these noisy samples, inspired by self-paced learning and robust loss functions. Our proposed approach, Robust Entropy Adaptive Loss Minimization (REALM), achieves better adaptation accuracy than previous approaches throughout the adaptation process on corruptions of CIFAR-10 and ImageNet-1K, demonstrating its effectiveness.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2023.

Builds on

39 of 61 references.

References · 39

  1. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  2. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  3. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
  4. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  5. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  6. 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,524
  7. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
  8. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
  9. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
  10. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 848
  11. 2021Domain Generalization: A Surveycited by 764
  12. 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 525
27 more
  1. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
  2. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 431
  3. 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 415
  4. 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 377
  5. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 359
  6. 2016Revisiting Batch Normalization For Practical Domain Adaptationcited by 288
  7. 2017A General and Adaptive Robust Loss Functioncited by 236
  8. 2020Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shiftcited by 236
  9. 2020Universal Source-Free Domain Adaptationcited by 220
  10. 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
  11. 2022Parameter-free Online Test-time Adaptationcited by 189
  12. 2019A review of domain adaptation without target labelscited by 156
  13. 2023EcoTTA: Memory-Efficient Continual Test-time Adaptation via Self-distilled Regularizationcited by 123
  14. 2019Adversarial AutoAugmentcited by 111
  15. 2021On the Validity of Modeling SGD with Stochastic Differential Equations (SDEs)cited by 73
  16. 2022Back to the Source: Diffusion-Driven Test-Time Adaptationcited by 71
  17. 2022Improving Test-Time Adaptation via Shift-agnostic Weight Regularization and Nearest Source Prototypescited by 67
  18. 2023On Pitfalls of Test-Time Adaptationcited by 64
  19. 2021SITA: Single Image Test-time Adaptationcited by 59
  20. 2020Revisiting Batch Normalization for Improving Corruption Robustnesscited by 55
  21. 2021Test time Adaptation through Perturbation Robustnesscited by 28
  22. 2020Choosing the Sample with Lowest Loss makes SGD Robustcited by 26
  23. 2016Self-Paced Learning: an Implicit Regularization Perspectivecited by 21
  24. 2020One-Shot Unsupervised Cross-Domain Detectioncited by 19
  25. 2022Listen, Adapt, Better WER: Source-free Single-utterance Test-time Adaptation for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 19
  26. 2022Variational Model Perturbation for Source-Free Domain Adaptationcited by 18
  27. 2023AUTO: Adaptive Outlier Optimization for Test-Time OOD Detectioncited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

7 papers.