mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Concepts Learned Visually by Infants Can Contribute to Visual Learning and Understanding in AI Models

arXiv 2503.03361 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2025cs.AI cs.NEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Early in development, infants learn to extract surprisingly complex aspects of visual scenes. This early learning comes together with an initial understanding of the extracted concepts, such as their implications, causality, and using them to predict likely future events. In many cases, this learning is obtained with little or no supervision, and from relatively few examples, compared to current network models. Empirical studies of visual perception in early development have shown that in the domain of objects and human-object interactions, early-acquired concepts are often used in the process of learning additional, more complex concepts. In the current work, we model how early-acquired concepts are used in the learning of subsequent concepts, and compare the results with standard deep network modeling. We focused in particular on the use of the concepts of animacy and goal attribution in learning to predict future events in dynamic visual scenes. We show that the use of early concepts in the learning of new concepts leads to better learning (higher accuracy) and more efficient learning (requiring less data), and that the combination of early and new concepts shapes the representation of the concepts acquired by the model and improves its generalization. We further compare advanced vision-language models to a human study in a task that requires an understanding of the behavior of animate vs. inanimate agents, with results supporting the contribution of early concepts to visual understanding. We finally briefly discuss the possible benefits of incorporating aspects of human-like visual learning into computer vision models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2025.

Builds on

8 of 44 references.

References · 8

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2023Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionalitycited by 496
  4. 2018Deep learning generalizes because the parameter-function map is biased towards simple functionscited by 180
  5. 2021Baby Intuitions Benchmark (BIB): Discerning the goals, preferences, and actions of otherscited by 39
  6. 2024The Generative AI Paradox on Evaluation: What It Can Solve, It May Not Evaluatecited by 16
  7. 2022Solving the Baby Intuitions Benchmark with a Hierarchically Bayesian Theory of Mindcited by 9
  8. 2023Neural Reasoning About Agents' Goals, Preferences, and Actionscited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Zero-shot World Models Are Developmentally Efficient Learners
  2. 2025BabyVLM: Data-Efficient Pretraining of VLMs Inspired by Infant Learning
  3. 2025BabyVLM-V2: Toward Developmentally Grounded Pretraining and Benchmarking of Vision Foundation Models
  4. 2025Assessing the alignment between infants' visual and linguistic experience using multimodal language models
  5. 2025Benchmarking Attribute Discrimination in Infant-Scale Vision-Language Models
  6. 2024Learning 3D object-centric representation through prediction
  7. 2025Learning to See Before Seeing: Demystifying LLM Visual Priors from Language Pre-training
  8. 2026KidVis: Do Multimodal Large Language Models Possess the Visual Perceptual Capabilities of a 6-Year-Old?