Don't Get Too Excited -- Eliciting Emotions in LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper investigates the challenges of affect control in large language models (LLMs), focusing on their ability to express appropriate emotional states during extended dialogues. We evaluated state-of-the-art open-weight LLMs to assess their affective expressive range in terms of arousal and valence. Our study employs a novel methodology combining LLM-based sentiment analysis with multiturn dialogue simulations between LLMs. We quantify the models' capacity to express a wide spectrum of emotions and how they fluctuate during interactions. Our findings reveal significant variations among LLMs in their ability to maintain consistent affect, with some models demonstrating more stable emotional trajectories than others. Furthermore, we identify key challenges in affect control, including difficulties in producing and maintaining extreme emotional states and limitations in adapting affect to changing conversational contexts. These findings have important implications for the development of more emotionally intelligent AI systems and highlight the need for improved affect modelling in LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2025.
Builds on
6 of 36 references.
References · 6
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2023OpenChat: Advancing Open-source Language Models with Mixed-Quality Datacited by 250
- 2023"Kelly is a Warm Person, Joseph is a Role Model": Gender Biases in LLM-Generated Reference Letterscited by 196
- 2024Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debatescited by 98
- 2024Investigating Bias in LLM-Based Bias Detection: Disparities between LLMs and Human Perceptioncited by 55
- 2023Quantifying Valence and Arousal in Text with Multilingual Pre-trained Transformerscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 8.
9 papers.
- 2026Confundo: Learning to Generate Robust Poison for Practical RAG Systemscited by 5
- 2025Incongruent Positivity: When Miscalibrated Positivity Undermines Online Supportive Conversationscited by 1
- 2026Quantitative Introspection in Language Models: Tracking Emotive States Across Conversationcited by 1
- 2026Modeling Multi-Dimensional Cognitive States in Large Language Models under Cognitive Crowdingcited by 1
- 2026A Hormone-inspired Emotion Layer for Transformer language models (HELT)cited by 0
- 2026AttuneBench: A Conversation-Based Benchmark for LLM Emotional Intelligencecited by 0
- 2026Evaluating LLM Usage for Efficient and Explainable Numerical and Classified Implicit Sentiment Analysis of Product Desirabilitycited by 0
- 2026VA-DPO: Valence-Arousal Direct Preference Optimization for Controllable Emotion Generation in Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026You Can't Prefer Emotions You Don't Sample: Intensity Undershoot in DPO-Tuned LLMscited by 0
- 2026You Can't Prefer Emotions You Don't Sample: Intensity Undershoot in DPO-Tuned LLMs7 Sep 2026
- 2026VA-DPO: Valence-Arousal Direct Preference Optimization for Controllable Emotion Generation in Language Models23 Jun 2026
- 2026Evaluating LLM Usage for Efficient and Explainable Numerical and Classified Implicit Sentiment Analysis of Product Desirability4 Jun 2026
- 2026AttuneBench: A Conversation-Based Benchmark for LLM Emotional Intelligence20 May 2026
- 2026Modeling Multi-Dimensional Cognitive States in Large Language Models under Cognitive Crowding19 Apr 2026
- 2026A Hormone-inspired Emotion Layer for Transformer language models (HELT)13 Apr 2026
- 2026Quantitative Introspection in Language Models: Tracking Emotive States Across Conversation19 Mar 2026
- 2026Confundo: Learning to Generate Robust Poison for Practical RAG Systems6 Feb 2026
- 2025Incongruent Positivity: When Miscalibrated Positivity Undermines Online Supportive Conversations12 Sep 2025