mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Detecting Stylistic Fingerprints of Large Language Models

arXiv 2503.01659 ↗First posted 3 Mar 2025cs.CLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have distinct and consistent stylistic fingerprints, even when prompted to write in different writing styles. Detecting these fingerprints is important for many reasons, among them protecting intellectual property, ensuring transparency regarding AI-generated content, and preventing the misuse of AI technologies. In this paper, we present a novel method to classify texts based on the stylistic fingerprints of the models that generated them. We introduce an LLM-detection ensemble that is composed of three classifiers with varied architectures and training data. This ensemble is trained to classify texts generated by four well-known LLM families: Claude, Gemini, Llama, and OpenAI. As this task is highly cost-sensitive and might have severe implications, we want to minimize false-positives and increase confidence. We consider a prediction as valid when all three classifiers in the ensemble unanimously agree on the output classification. Our ensemble is validated on a test set of texts generated by Claude, Gemini, Llama, and OpenAI models, and achieves extremely high precision (0.9988) and a very low false-positive rate (0.0004). Furthermore, we demonstrate the ensemble's ability to distinguish between texts generated by seen and unseen models. This reveals interesting stylistic relationships between models. This approach to stylistic analysis has implications for verifying the originality of AI-generated texts and tracking the origins of model training techniques.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2025.

Builds on

12 of 30 references.

References · 12

  1. 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 711
  2. 2024Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challengescited by 47
  3. 2021Tracing Text Provenance via Context-Aware Lexical Substitutioncited by 45
  4. 2024Benchmarking Linguistic Diversity of Large Language Modelscited by 38
  5. 2019Explainable Authorship Verification in Social Media via Attention-based Similarity Learningcited by 37
  6. 2024Your Large Language Models Are Leaving Fingerprintscited by 33
  7. 2024Detecting AI-Generated Text: Factors Influencing Detectability with Current Methodscited by 23
  8. 2024The Rise of AI-Generated Content in Wikipediacited by 22
  9. 2024Ten Words Only Still Help: Improving Black-Box AI-Generated Text Detection via Proxy-Guided Efficient Re-Samplingcited by 20
  10. 2024Decoding the AI Pen: Techniques and Challenges in Detecting AI-Generated Textcited by 14
  11. 2023Neural Authorship Attribution: Stylometric Analysis on Large Language Modelscited by 11
  12. 2020The foundations of cost-sensitive causal classificationcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 7.

11 papers.