mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Embracing Diversity: A Multi-Perspective Approach with Soft Labels

arXiv 2503.00489 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.HCcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prior studies show that adopting the annotation diversity shaped by different backgrounds and life experiences and incorporating them into the model learning, i.e. multi-perspective approach, contribute to the development of more responsible models. Thus, in this paper we propose a new framework for designing and further evaluating perspective-aware models on stance detection task,in which multiple annotators assign stances based on a controversial topic. We also share a new dataset established through obtaining both human and LLM annotations. Results show that the multi-perspective approach yields better classification performance (higher F1-scores), outperforming the traditional approaches that use a single ground-truth, while displaying lower model confidence scores, probably due to the high level of subjectivity of the stance detection task.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2025.

Builds on

28 of 39 references.

References · 28

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  5. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  6. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
  7. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
  8. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
  9. 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 759
  10. 2024OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Modelscited by 599
  11. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 461
  12. 2021Dealing with Disagreements: Looking Beyond the Majority Vote in Subjective Annotationscited by 306
16 more
  1. 2023Can Large Language Models Transform Computational Social Science?cited by 245
  2. 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 231
  3. 2022The 'Problem' of Human Label Variation: On Ground Truth in Data, Modeling and Evaluationcited by 133
  4. 2021Toward a Perspectivist Turn in Ground Truthing for Predictive Computingcited by 129
  5. 2023Can ChatGPT Reproduce Human-Generated Labels? A Study of Social Computing Taskscited by 88
  6. 2023Uncertainty in Natural Language Generation: From Theory to Applicationscited by 61
  7. 2023SemEval-2023 Task 11: Learning With Disagreements (LeWiDi)cited by 52
  8. 2024Beyond Preferences in AI Alignmentcited by 46
  9. 2023Uncertainty in Natural Language Processing: Sources, Quantification, and Applicationscited by 44
  10. 2022Eliciting and Learning with Soft Labels from Every Annotatorcited by 43
  11. 2021Whose Opinions Matter? Perspective-aware Models to Identify Opinions of Hate Speech Victims in Abusive Language Detectioncited by 38
  12. 2023Can Large Language Models Capture Dissenting Human Voices?cited by 33
  13. 2024The Effectiveness of LLMs as Annotators: A Comparative Overview and Empirical Analysis of Direct Representationcited by 29
  14. 2022Evaluation Metrics for Measuring Bias in Search Engine Resultscited by 12
  15. 2024D3CODE: Disentangling Disagreements in Data across Cultures on Offensiveness Detection and Evaluationcited by 9
  16. 2023The Two Word Test: A Semantic Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.