mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LinguaLens: Towards Interpreting Linguistic Mechanisms of Large Language Models via Sparse Auto-Encoder

arXiv 2502.20344 ↗First posted 27 Feb 2025cs.CLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional performance on tasks requiring complex linguistic abilities, such as reference disambiguation and metaphor recognition/generation. Although LLMs possess impressive capabilities, their internal mechanisms for processing and representing linguistic knowledge remain largely opaque. Prior research on linguistic mechanisms is limited by coarse granularity, limited analysis scale, and narrow focus. In this study, we propose LinguaLens, a systematic and comprehensive framework for analyzing the linguistic mechanisms of large language models, based on Sparse Auto-Encoders (SAEs). We extract a broad set of Chinese and English linguistic features across four dimensions (morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics). By employing counterfactual methods, we construct a large-scale counterfactual dataset of linguistic features for mechanism analysis. Our findings reveal intrinsic representations of linguistic knowledge in LLMs, uncover patterns of cross-layer and cross-lingual distribution, and demonstrate the potential to control model outputs. This work provides a systematic suite of resources and methods for studying linguistic mechanisms, offers strong evidence that LLMs possess genuine linguistic knowledge, and lays the foundation for more interpretable and controllable language modeling in future research.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2025.

Builds on

16 of 23 references.

References · 16

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  2. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  3. 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
  4. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
  5. 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 553
  6. 2021Polyjuice: Generating Counterfactuals for Explaining, Evaluating, and Improving Modelscited by 219
  7. 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoderscited by 171
  8. 2021Causal Analysis of Syntactic Agreement Mechanisms in Neural Language Modelscited by 127
  9. 2022Interpreting Language Models with Contrastive Explanationscited by 91
  10. 2021Neuron-level Interpretation of Deep NLP Models: A Surveycited by 81
  11. 2021CLiMP: A Benchmark for Chinese Language Model Evaluationcited by 44
  12. 2024Decoding Probing: Revealing Internal Linguistic Structures in Neural Language Models using Minimal Pairscited by 24
4 more
  1. 2022BenchCLAMP: A Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models on Syntactic and Semantic Parsingcited by 12
  2. 2023Verb Conjugation in Transformers Is Determined by Linear Encodings of Subject Numbercited by 12
  3. 2024Encourage or Inhibit Monosemanticity? Revisit Monosemanticity from a Feature Decorrelation Perspectivecited by 10
  4. 2020Structured Self-Attention Weights Encode Semantics in Sentiment Analysiscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 13.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: