From Representations to Behaviors: Exploring the Person-Situation-Behavior Triad in LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Human personality theories characterize traits not as isolated attributes captured by a single score, but as stable individual tendencies expressed through the interplay among persons, situations, and behaviors. Existing studies of personality-related behavior in LLMs have primarily focused on outputs elicited under personality conditioning, characterizing observable trait-related expressions while lacking mechanistic evidence for the existence of internal personality-related representations, their cross-situational expression, and how these representations shape specific behaviors. Building on Funder's personality triad framework, we adapt its three components for LLM analysis: Person as personality-related internal representations, Situation as contexts that afford trait-relevant responses, and Behavior as response patterns on broader social tasks. We introduce a framework for discovering, controlling, and validating trait-like representations in LLMs. First, using contrastive behavior pairs grounded in shared situations, we identify sparse internal features associated with opposing poles of personality traits through SAE decomposition. We validate their trait relevance through effects on behavior to situation, token-level activation patterns, and robustness to paraphrasing. Second, feature-level interventions induce bidirectional trait-related shifts across a separate, diverse set of situations while preserving response validity, demonstrating consistent expression across contexts. Third, applying the same interventions to social intelligence tasks reveals behavioral changes with benefit-tradeoff patterns consistent with findings from human personality research, providing behavioral-level validation beyond personality scores. Our findings provide evidence that LLMs contain controllable trait-like representations linking internal states, situational expression, and behavioral outcomes.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2026.
Builds on
16 of 48 references.
References · 16
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,009
- 2025Persona Vectors: Monitoring and Controlling Character Traits in Language Modelscited by 303
- 2024From Persona to Personalization: A Survey on Role-Playing Language Agentscited by 206
- 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnetcited by 175
- 2024Llama Scope: Extracting Millions of Features from Llama-3.1-8B with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 133
- 2024Do LLMs Have Distinct and Consistent Personality? TRAIT: Personality Testset designed for LLMs with Psychometricscited by 56
- 2024BIG5-CHAT: Shaping LLM Personalities Through Training on Human-Grounded Datacited by 49
- 2025Large Language Model Psychometrics: A Systematic Review of Evaluation, Validation, and Enhancementcited by 41
- 2023Self-Assessment Tests are Unreliable Measures of LLM Personalitycited by 39
- 2025Understanding the Repeat Curse in Large Language Models from a Feature Perspectivecited by 36
- 2025The Personality Illusion: Revealing Dissociation Between Self-Reports & Behavior in LLMscited by 35
- 2023Have Large Language Models Developed a Personality?: Applicability of Self-Assessment Tests in Measuring Personality in LLMscited by 32
4 more
- 2024The Better Angels of Machine Personality: How Personality Relates to LLM Safetycited by 21
- 2025Personality Vector: Modulating Personality of Large Language Models by Model Mergingcited by 16
- 2024LMLPA: Language Model Linguistic Personality Assessmentcited by 15
- 2025LinguaLens: Towards Interpreting Linguistic Mechanisms of Large Language Models via Sparse Auto-Encodercited by 13
Built on by
Not cited yet.