mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Decoding Probing: Revealing Internal Linguistic Structures in Neural Language Models using Minimal Pairs

arXiv 2403.17299 ↗First posted 26 Mar 2024cs.CL q-bio.NCcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Inspired by cognitive neuroscience studies, we introduce a novel `decoding probing' method that uses minimal pairs benchmark (BLiMP) to probe internal linguistic characteristics in neural language models layer by layer. By treating the language model as the `brain' and its representations as `neural activations', we decode grammaticality labels of minimal pairs from the intermediate layers' representations. This approach reveals: 1) Self-supervised language models capture abstract linguistic structures in intermediate layers that GloVe and RNN language models cannot learn. 2) Information about syntactic grammaticality is robustly captured through the first third layers of GPT-2 and also distributed in later layers. As sentence complexity increases, more layers are required for learning grammatical capabilities. 3) Morphological and semantics/syntax interface-related features are harder to capture than syntax. 4) For Transformer-based models, both embeddings and attentions capture grammatical features but show distinct patterns. Different attention heads exhibit similar tendencies toward various linguistic phenomena, but with varied contributions.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2024.

Builds on

10 of 32 references.

References · 10

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 553
  4. 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 436
  5. 2015Understanding Neural Networks Through Deep Visualizationcited by 332
  6. 2018Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 239
  7. 2018What do RNN Language Models Learn about Filler-Gap Dependencies?cited by 86
  8. 2018Finding Syntax in Human Encephalography with Beam Searchcited by 41
  9. 2021Disentangling Syntax and Semantics in the Brain with Deep Networkscited by 39
  10. 2023Do self-supervised speech and language models extract similar representations as human brain?cited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 11; 2026: 11.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025LinguaLens: Towards Interpreting Linguistic Mechanisms of Large Language Models via Sparse Auto-Encodercited by 13
  2. 2025XCOMPS: A Multilingual Benchmark of Conceptual Minimal Pairscited by 9
  3. 2026Differential syntactic and semantic encoding in LLMscited by 6
  4. 2025Model Internal Sleuthing: Finding Lexical Identity and Inflectional Features in Modern Language Modelscited by 5
  5. 2025Layer-wise Minimal Pair Probing Reveals Contextual Grammatical-Conceptual Hierarchy in Speech Representationscited by 5
  6. 2024Large Language Models as Neurolinguistic Subjects: Discrepancy between Performance and Competencecited by 4
  7. 2025HARP: Hallucination Detection via Reasoning Subspace Projectioncited by 4
  8. 2025LLM Hallucination Detection: A Fast Fourier Transform Method Based on Hidden Layer Temporal Signalscited by 4
  9. 2025CARMA: Enhanced Compositionality in LLMs via Advanced Regularisation and Mutual Information Alignmentcited by 3
  10. 2025SeisMoLLM: Advancing Seismic Monitoring via Cross-modal Transfer with Pre-trained Large Language Modelcited by 3
  11. 2026Tracing the complexity profiles of different linguistic phenomena through the intrinsic dimension of LLM representationscited by 3
  12. 2025Bi-directional Model Cascading with Proxy Confidencecited by 2
12 more
  1. 2025Steering Language Models in Multi-Token Generation: A Case Study on Tense and Aspectcited by 2
  2. 2026From Chains to DAGs: Probing the Graph Structure of Reasoning in LLMscited by 2
  3. 2026Dual Alignment Between Language Model Layers and Human Sentence Processingcited by 2
  4. 2024Linguistic Minimal Pairs Elicit Linguistic Similarity in Large Language Modelscited by 1
  5. 2025LLM Hallucination Detection: HSADcited by 1
  6. 2026The Grammar of Transformers: A Systematic Review of Interpretability Research on Syntactic Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 1
  7. 2026The ACUTE Protocol: Operationalizing Language Model Activations for Better Calibration, Utility, and Trustcited by 1
  8. 2026Extending Minimal Pairs with Ordinal Surprisal Curves and Entropy Across Applied Domainscited by 0
  9. 2026When Models Know More Than They Say: Probing Analogical Reasoning in LLMscited by 0
  10. 2026MADS: Model-Aware Diverse Core Set Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 0
  11. 2026ProbeScale: Probing Analysis to Optimize Neural Scaling Laws for Efficient Small Language Model Inferencecited by 0
  12. 2026Grammatical "grandmother neurons" are rare in LLMscited by 0